Laserfiche WebLink
4. Expiration. Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five (5) years after <br />the effective date of a shoreline permit, unless extended in accordance with the provisions <br />below. <br />5. Extension. The Administrator may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one <br />(1) year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the <br />expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record on the <br />shoreline permit and to the Washington State Department of Ecology. <br />6. Exclusions. The time periods in this Section do not include the time during which a use or <br />activity was not actually pursued due to the pendency of administrative appeals or legal actions <br />or due to the need to obtain any other government permits and approvals for the proposal, <br />including all reasonably related administrative or legal actions on any such permits or approvals. <br />7. Flexibility. Upon a finding of good cause, based on the requirements and circumstances of the <br />project proposed and consistent with the policy and provisions of the master program and RCW <br />90.58, the County may adopt different time limits from those set forth in this subsection as part <br />of action on a Substantial Development Permit. <br />(Ord. 2016-006,2016) <br />178.O7.100 Revisions. <br />1. Applicability. <br />a. Substantive changes. A permit revision is required whenever the applicant proposes <br />substantive changes to the design, terms, or conditions of a project from that which is <br />approved in the permit. Changes are substantive if they materially alter the project in a <br />manner that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of the permit, the <br />Master Program and/or the policies and provisions of the Shoreline Management Act (RCW <br />90.58). Changes which are not substantive in effect do not require approval of a revision. <br />b. Substantial development. lf the proposed change, or the sum of the proposed revisions <br />and any previously approved revisions, constitutes substantial development then the <br />applicant is not eligible for the revision process and shall be required to apply for a new <br />permit. <br />2. Submittal requirements. An applicant seeking to revise a permit shall submit detailed plans and <br />text describing the proposed changes to the Administrator. <br />3. Review criteria and findings. The Administrator may approve a revision when the proposed <br />changesarewithinthescopeandintentoftheoriginal@areconsistent <br />with the applicable Master Program and the Act. At a minimum, Administrator must find: <br />a. No additional over-water construction is involved except that pier, dock, or float <br />construction may be increased by five hundred (500) square feet or ten percent (10%) from <br />the provisions of the original permit, whichever is less; <br />b. Ground area coverage and height may be increased a maximum of ten percent (10%) from <br />the provisions of the original permit; <br />c. The revised permit does not authorize development to exceed height, lot coverage, <br />setback, or any other requirements of the applicable Master Program except as authorized <br />under a variance granted as the original permit or a part thereof; <br />d. Additional or revised landscaping is consistent with any conditions attached to the original <br />permit and with the applicable Master Program; <br />e. The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is not changed; and <br />f. No adverse environmental impact will be caused by the project revision