Laserfiche WebLink
review process, if applicable), and requests an archaeological survey be <br />completed due to the presence of one or more of the following risk-factors: <br />▪ Documented historic feature(s) on the property or located within one <br />quarter (1/4) mile from the project area; <br />▪ Previous positive archaeological survey results from a survey on the <br />property or within one quarter (1/4) mile from the project area; or <br />▪ A tribally-recorded site located within one quarter (1/4) mile of the <br />project area. <br />iii. DAHP and an affected Native American tribe timely comment through the above <br />cultural resources review process (or concurrent permitting or environmental <br />review process, if applicable), and both DAHP and the affected Native American <br />tribe request that an archaeological survey be completed due to a professional <br />archaeologist’s determination that the project area is in an area that is at high- <br />risk for the presence of archaeological resources (e.g. in an area with high-risk <br />soil deposit types such as historic high-energy soil deposits, or soils with multiple <br />depositional contexts). <br />iv. The County determines that an archaeological survey is otherwise warranted. <br />d. Archaeological Survey & Reporting Standards. Archaeological surveys shall be <br />completed by a professional archaeologist. Archaeological survey reports shall <br />conform to DAHP’s then-current reporting standards. Both DAHP and affected Native <br />American tribes shall receive copies of completed archaeological survey reports, and <br />have a reasonable opportunity (in no case less than fifteen days) to comment on their <br />sufficiency before such reports shall be considered final. Final archaeological survey <br />reports shall be filed with DAHP prior to the County’s issuance of a permit, exemption, <br />or other approval where the proposed project is not exempt under KCC <br />17B.05.010(B)(1)(a)*. <br />e. Monitoring Alternative. Despite the requirements of KCC 17B.05.010(B)(1)(c)*, above, <br />an archaeological survey shall not be required where the project proponent, the <br />County, DAHP, and any affected Native American tribes, all approve a written plan for <br />on-site project monitoring by a professional archaeologist throughout all project <br />phases that include ground-disturbing work. This monitoring plan shall be drafted by <br />a professional archaeologist at the applicant’s expense. <br />f. Project Modification Alternative. Despite the requirements of KCC 17B.05.010(B)(1)(c)*, <br />above, an archaeological survey shall not be required where the project is modified so <br />that it no longer triggers the risk factor(s) under KCC 17B.05.010(B)(1)(c)* that would <br />have resulted in the need for an archeological survey under these regulations. <br />2. Inadvertent Discoveries. Developers and property owners shall immediately stop work and <br />notify the local government, DAHP, and affected Native American tribes if archaeological <br />resources are discovered. Construction may recommence pursuant to RCW 27.44.040, RCW <br />27.53.040 and WAC 25-48-030. A notification stating this requirement shall be included on <br />County shoreline permits, exemptions, and other project approval documents. <br />3. Resource Management. If signicant significant cultural, archaeological, or historic resources, <br />are identified in the project area, the project proponent shall engage a professional <br />archaeologist (or a historic preservation professional, where appropriate) to prepare a <br />resource management plan. Tdhe The resource management plan shall, at a minimum, <br />conform to DAHP's then-current management standards. In addition, a permit or other