My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SMP Ordinance Exhibits
>
Meetings
>
2021
>
05. May
>
2021-05-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
SMP Ordinance Exhibits
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2021 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
5/13/2021 12:35:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
5/18/2021
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
e
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance Concerning the Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Required by RCW 90.58.080(4)
Order
5
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
76503
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 70 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />7. Mitigation ratios for wetland impacts: Mitigation ratios shall be used when impacts to <br />wetlands cannot be avoided, as specified in Table 5.2-2. The first number specifies <br />the acreage of replacement wetlands, and the second specifies the acreage of <br />wetlands altered. Compensatory mitigation shall restore, create, rehabilitate or <br />enhance equivalent or greater wetland functions. The ratios shall apply to mitigation <br />that is in-kind, is on-site, is the same category, is timed prior to or concurrent with <br />alteration, and has a high probability of success. These ratios do not apply to the <br />use of credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank or ILF program. When credits <br />from a certified bank or ILF program are used, replacement ratios should be <br />consistent with the requirements of the bank’s/program’s certification. <br /> <br />Table 5.2-2. Wetland Mitigation Ratios for Unavoidable Wetland Impacts in <br />Shoreline Jurisdiction <br /> <br />Category and <br />Type of <br />Impacted <br />Wetland <br />Restoration or <br />Creation1,2 Rehabilitation1,2 Enhancement <br />Only1,3 <br />Category I, <br />forested 6:1 12:1 24:1 <br />Category I, non- <br />forested 4:1 8:1 16:1 <br />Category II, <br />forested 4:1 8:1 16:1 <br />Category II, <br />vernal pool4 2:1 4:1 Case-by-case <br />All other <br />Category II 3:1 6:1 12:1 <br />All Category III 2:1 4:1 8:1 <br />All Category IV 1.5:1 3:1 6:1 <br /> <br />1Natural heritage sites, alkali wetlands, and bogs are considered irreplaceable wetlands because they perform special <br />functions that cannot be replaced through compensatory mitigation. Impact to such wetlands would therefore result in <br />a net loss of some functions no matter what kind of mitigation is provided. <br />2Provides gains in a whole suite of functions both at the site and landscape scale. Rehabilitation actions often focus on <br />restoring environmental processes that have been disturbed or altered by previous ongoing human activity. <br />3Actions which provide gains in only a few functions. Enhancement action often focus es on structural or superficial <br />improvements to a site and generally does not address larger scale environmental processes. <br />4Compensatory mitigation for vernal pool impacts must be seasonally ponded wetland area(s). <br /> <br />8. Increased replacement ratios: The Administrator shall increase the wetland <br />mitigation ratios under the following circumstances:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.