My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SMP Ordinance Exhibits
>
Meetings
>
2021
>
05. May
>
2021-05-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
SMP Ordinance Exhibits
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2021 12:38:43 PM
Creation date
5/13/2021 12:35:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
5/18/2021
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
e
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance Concerning the Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Required by RCW 90.58.080(4)
Order
5
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
76503
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 59 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />5. Temporary or permanent field identification: Prior to use and/or development within <br />or adjacent to a critical area, the County should require temporary or permanent field <br />markers delineating the critical area boundary and associated buffer. The type of <br />field markers to be used will be agreed to by the project proponent and the <br />Administrator depending on site conditions and inspection requirements. Field <br />markers shall be spaced at a minimum of every fifty (50) feet, unless alternative <br />placement or spacing is authorized by the Administrator. The location of field stakes <br />must be shown on all site plans and final plats associated with the development <br />proposal. Field markers shall remain in place until any required final inspections are <br />completed and approved. Field markers may be waived by the Administrator if an <br />alternative to field staking achieves the same objective, or if the development and <br />construction activity(ies) is located at a sufficient distance so that impacts to the <br />critical area are unlikely to occur. The Administrator may require permanent fencing <br />and/or signage if necessary to protect a critical area and its buffer from adjacent land <br />uses. <br /> <br />6. Notice on title: Any property on which a development proposal is submitted shall <br />have filed with the Kittitas County Auditor: <br />a. A notice on title of the presence and location of the critical area and/or buffer; <br />b. A statement as to the applicability of this Program to the property; and <br />c. A statement describing possible limitations on action in or affecting critical areas <br />or buffer as approved by the Administrator. The County shall record such <br />documents and will provide a copy of the recorded notice to the property owner <br />of record. Development proposals which are defined as normal repair and <br />maintenance of existing structures or development, including, but not limited to, <br />roof repair, interior remodeling, wood stove permits, and on-site sewage disposal <br />systems repairs, are exempt from this requirement. <br /> <br />7. Request for technical assistance: The Administrator may engage technical <br />consultants to review and interpret critical areas data and findings submitted by or <br />on behalf of the proponent, in instances where County staff lack the resources or <br />expertise to review these materials. A project proponent may be required to pay for <br />or reimburse the County for the review costs incurred. <br /> <br />8. Pre-Qualification of consultants: The Administrator shall prepare and maintain a list <br />of qualified technical consultants and firms that meet the qualified professional <br />standards detailed in this Section. Any proposed consultant whose name is not on <br />the list may submit a statement of qualifications including information on experience <br />in the preparation of critical area studies. Upon approval of the submitted <br />qualifications, the Administrator shall add the name to the list of qualified <br />consultants. The Administrator may reject data and findings from non -pre-qualified <br />consultants or require a third-party review, paid for by the applicant. <br /> <br />9. When there is a conflict between the findings of a critical areas study and the <br />findings of the Administrator in review of the study, the applicant or affected party
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.