Laserfiche WebLink
09/30/2009 5190.6B <br />Page 12-9 <br />“through-the-fence” operator are so much more favorable; <br /> <br />(5). Affecting the airport’s ability to be self-sustaining, in violation of Grant Assurance 24, Fee <br />and Rental Structure, because the airport may not be in a position to charge “through-the-fence” <br />operators adequately for the use of the airfield; <br /> <br />(6). Weakening the airport’s ability to remove and mitigate hazards and incompatible land uses, <br />in violation of Grant Assurance 20, Hazard Removal and Mitigation, and Grant Assurance 21, <br />Compatible Land Use. <br /> <br />(7). Making it more difficult for an airport sponsor to implement future security requirements <br />that may be imposed on airports. <br /> <br />g. While FAA does not support “through-the-fence” access, should a sponsor choose to proceed, <br />it should do so only under the following conditions: <br /> <br />(1). FAA Review. Seek FAA review to ensure that its decision will not result in a violation of <br />its federal obligations, either now or in the future. It has been the FAA’s experience that airport <br />sponsors find it difficult to correct grant assurance violations that result from “through-the- <br /> <br />The “through-the-fence” operator shall not have a right to assign or sell the right of access without the <br />express prior written approval of the sponsor. The sponsor shall have the right to amend the terms of the <br />access agreement to reflect a change in value to the off-airport property at the time of the approved sale if <br />the “through-the-fence” access is to continue. (Photo: AOPA)