Laserfiche WebLink
4.2 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br />The Cedar Gulch HEC -RAS model was configured and run for the 100 -year flows listed in Table 3. The <br />upper and lower Crystal Creek models were run for the five flow quantiles (10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year <br />events) shown in Table 3. Flows were specified at the upstream end of each reach, confluence locations, <br />and downstream of major tributary inflows. <br />Normal depth boundary conditions were applied at the downstream end of Cedar Gulch Creek and the <br />lower Crystal Creek model reach, and at the downstream (east) boundary of the 2D area in Cie Elum. <br />Friction slopes were determined based on average channel/basin slope at each location. The upper Crystal <br />Creek steady ID model used a fixed water surface boundary condition that was based on the steady state <br />water surface elevation output from the lower Crystal Creek model. <br />Model simulations for Cedar Gulch Creek and Upper Crystal Creek were performed using the subcritical <br />t <br />flow regime option. Model simulations for the lower Crystal Creek ],* D model were performed using <br />the subcritical unsteady flow option with constant inflows (pseudy state). For model stability, flows <br />in the lower Crystal Creek model were ramped up to the V staff ipflow shown in Table 3 over <br />approximately 48 hours. <br />4.2.2 MODEL RESULTS <br />Model results for the 100 -year event on Cedar QWch Creek, fpr Crystal Creek, and Lower Crystal Creek <br />are included in Appendix A. Flood profiles forth$Z]-; 50-, 1•, and 500 -year event on Crystal Creek <br />are provided in Appendix B as 01P through 20P — mj-oed`ac�3rding to FEMA FIS profile guidelines and <br />specifications. Mapping was completed"date'l replace the effective FEMA floodplain within the <br />5 ' <br />study area. <br />4.2.3 FLOODWAY MODELING <br />The "regulatory floodwa means chAgi*1 of the creek and the adjacent land that must be reserved <br />in order to discharge* 100 -year fIciaod without increasing the water surface elevation more than a <br />designation height (typic�N'"1_foot).SE defined a floodway for the entire Crystal Creek study reach. An <br />effective floodway currently e4"r the lower 9900 feet of Crystal Creek but was defined as "coincident <br />with the 100 -year boundary" (FtMA, 1981). WSE determined an updated floodway boundary through an <br />encroachment analysis by the following steps: <br />Within the lower model: <br />Applied the effective floodway boundary to the updated model using blocked obstructions. The <br />boundary had to be adjusted in several areas where the effective floodway boundary was outside <br />the current 100 -year boundary. <br />• Ran the model to simulate the 100 -year flood, with floodway enforced. <br />Compared floodway water surface elevations to BFEs to determine if floodway rise was less than <br />1 foot at all cross sections. <br />WATERSHED P a g e 19 <br />SCIENCE 4 ENGINLERING <br />