My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-11-23-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2020
>
12. December
>
2020-12-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2020-11-23-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2020 1:33:52 PM
Creation date
12/10/2020 1:33:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/15/2020
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
70274
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KITTITAS COUNTY <br />DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMNHSSIONERS <br />STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />STUDY SESSION DATE: November 23, 2020 <br />TOPIC: Coleman Creek at Vantage Highway Update <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Support Staff's Decision Rejecting Asphalt <br />LEAD STAFF: <br />Mark R. Cook and Joshua Fredrickson. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Reject unsuitable asphalt paving at Coleman Creek on Vantage Highway. <br />BRIEFING SUMMARY: <br />• Fish barrier removal project on Coleman Creek at Vantage Highway is <br />substantially complete. <br />• Poor paving without 2% cross -slope is being rejected. <br />• County is looking for a remedy from the contractor. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />During recent final paving at Coleman Creek Fish Barrier Removal Project (Vantage <br />Highway); the contractor was directed to shape roadway cross -slope ahead of paving. <br />The contractor refused. The road's inconsistent cross -slope now provides an <br />unacceptable rough ride. The Contractor is burdened with providing survey control. The <br />County contract included a bid item for contractor survey control. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />Public Works (PW) has noticed the contractor (Belsaas and Smith, Inc.) of our pending <br />rejection of asphalt paving. PW is awaiting a proposal from the contractor addressing the <br />pavement deficiency. PW is not paying for any asphalt in the interim. PW is allowing <br />the contractor to propose a remedy. Anticipated options to remedy the deficient <br />pavement include: grinding the top layer and repaving with grade control, or removing <br />all asphalt and replacing with grade control. Failure on the part of the contractor to <br />provide a suitable correction may result in additional action including non-payment for <br />pavement work or suspend the contractor for a three year period from doing any further <br />County construction work. <br />FISCAL IMPACTS: <br />Contract paving is bid at: $58,500.00. PW estimates that grinding and re -paving the top <br />layer of asphalt will likely cost approximately $27,000.00. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY CONMSSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.