My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-19-00001 Marian Meadows Development Agreement Master File
>
Meetings
>
2020
>
10. October
>
2020-10-06 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DV-19-00001 Marian Meadows Development Agreement Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 1:55:20 PM
Creation date
10/1/2020 1:41:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/6/2020
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Public Hearing to Consider the Marian Meadows Development Agreement (DV-19-00001)
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
67284
Type
Hold Public Hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Lindsey Ozbolt <br />Mr. Neil Caulkins <br />January 30, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />Aamlicable Regulations <br />At the time of the approval and the initial application for the Development Agreement, <br />Kittitas County Code 15A.11.010 read as follows: "A development agreement may be <br />appropriate for large, complex or phased projects, or projects which were not contemplated <br />by existing development regulations or existing application procedures. A development <br />agreement may include provisions which are different or in addition to other county <br />development regulations, as long as impacts are mitigated." <br />It is irrelevant that the County amended this Code in December of 2019 because <br />Community Development Services must apply the regulations governing development <br />agreements in effect at the time of the application. Kittitas County cannot change the rules <br />this late in review, after Easton Ridge Land Company invested well over a year of time in <br />drafting this Development Agreement. Instead, the Development Agreement is vested to <br />the regulations in effect at the time of application, which vesting includes Chapter 15A.11. <br />See Noble Manor Co. v. Pierce Cly., 133 Wn.2d 269, 275, 943 P.2d 1378 (1997) (citing <br />RCW 58.17.033). Further, having been imposed as a conditions of the Preliminary <br />Approval, the Development Agreement is also inextricably linked for purposes of vesting <br />as the Court. Schneider Homes, Inc. v. City of Kent, 87 Wn. App. 774, 779, 942 P.2d 1096 <br />(1997), amended on denial of reconsideration, 971 P.2d 56 (1997). <br />Despite the foregoing, Easton Ridge Land Company also maintains that the proposed <br />Development Agreement is not inconsistent with the new version of KCC 15A.11.010 as <br />it does not include provisions that are different from County Code. The Board of County <br />Commissioners has already concluded: "As conditioned, the proposed use is consistent <br />with the intent, purposes and regulations of the Kittitas County Code and Comprehensive <br />Plan." Therefore, it is irrelevant whether certain elements of the Development Agreement <br />application might be inconsistent with newer regulations; the Commissioners have already <br />determined the project, as a whole, was consistent with County Code. This determination <br />means the draft Development Agreement, tied to the Plat Approval meets the terms of the <br />current version of 15A.11.020(3): "A development agreement shall be consistent with <br />applicable county development regulations, except as such development regulations have <br />been modified by the development standards contained in the agreement." <br />Commercial Element. Service and Retail <br />The approved Preliminary Plat drawings clearly show an "RV RETAIL SHOP" located in <br />the middle of the development. See Exhibit 64, Preliminary Plat High Resolution Image. <br />These facilities are located in areas not suitable for residential development. While not <br />every reference to "commercial use" throughout the application specifies retail, repair or <br />services, it is clearly designated as such on the face of the approved Preliminary Plat. <br />Further, the project description following the high resolution drawings in Exhibit 64 <br />describes a "commercial element (RV repair and retail)." See also Exhibit 88, commercial <br />element. <br />f OIINS•MONRGI:•MITSLTNAGA•KOLousKovA • PLLc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.