Laserfiche WebLink
Advance mitigation can be proposed by any applicant, but the advance compensatory mitigation <br />credits generated by a mitigation effort in advance of impacts can only be used by that same <br />applicant. If it is determined a mitigation effort and the generated advance credits are not needed by <br />the permittee, they should coordinate possible options with the regulatory agencies. Once any credits <br />have been utilized on an approved advance mitigation site, further credits generated by the advance <br />mitigation effort on that site cannot be sold to another applicant. The restriction on sale of credits <br />derives from the lack of regulatory authority, except in a mitigation banking or in -lieu fee program <br />context, to transfer the obligation for mitigation success to any party other than the permittee of the <br />impacting project. <br />The credit value of mitigation efforts at a site will generally increase over time because the temporal <br />loss is eliminated or decreased if a mitigation effort is established and meeting performance <br />standards prior to the use of the generated credits. The longer a site is functioning, the more credits it <br />may generate for use until the site has reached its maximum potential of credits by meeting all of the <br />listed performance standards (typically around year ten). The general policy of the regulatory <br />agencies is that a site would not generate advance mitigation credit beyond the concurrent ratios <br />recommended in the most current Joint Guidance for wetland mitigation, or in the WDFW mitigation <br />policy POL-M5002 for fish habitat, until the site has been functioning and meeting the required <br />performance standards for a minimum of two calendar years after earth work and planting have been <br />completed. In cases where a permit applicant seeks to apply mitigation credits prior to this interval, <br />it will usually be reviewed as concurrent mitigation. There may be circumstances where the site, or a <br />portion of the site, may generate advance credit within the first two years (e.g., breaching dikes, <br />removing fish passage barriers, preserving existing wetland or fish habitat, and in some cases <br />wetland re-establishment or creation actions). These circumstances will be reviewed by the <br />regulatory agencies on a case-by-case basis. <br />When applying for approval to establish an advance mitigation site, applicants will need to provide <br />information similar to that required for a mitigation plan approval. Additional information pertinent <br />to the review of the advance proposal will also be required as defined in the "Proposing Advance <br />Mitigation" section on pages 5-6 of this document. The agencies also recommend submitting a <br />proposed credit generation schedule demonstrating a reduced ratio as the site matures, and proposed <br />credit value(s) the applicant is anticipating the advance site may generate. The geographic area <br />proposed as the potential project use area for future impacts should also be proposed by the applicant <br />based on a watershed approach. The regulatory agencies can review and finalize the credit <br />generation schedule and the geographic use area during the permitting process as part of the approval <br />for the mitigation plan. This will provide the applicant a conditional decision on the potential credits <br />a site may generate if a site is meeting performance standards outlined in the mitigation plan as well <br />as what geographic areas will be acceptable for use. If this information is not available at the time of <br />application for the advance mitigation establishment, it will be required to be approved by the <br />agencies prior to using any credits generated at the site. <br />At the time generated advance credits are proposed for use, the regulatory agencies with jurisdiction <br />over the impacting proposal will decide if the advance compensatory mitigation project provides the <br />appropriate type and extent of mitigation necessary to compensate for a project's impacts. The <br />agencies will also consider how the mitigation site is functioning prior to determining how much of <br />the advance credit is necessary to offset impacts (see "Use of the Advance Mitigation Site" section, <br />pages 7-8 of this document). Credits can only be used once and upon their use as mitigation the <br />mitigation effort reflected in these credits will not accumulate additional value over time. The <br />2 <br />