My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution_PFacilitiesAgmt_CityofEllensburg
>
Meetings
>
2020
>
07. July
>
2020-07-07 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Resolution_PFacilitiesAgmt_CityofEllensburg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2020 3:02:45 PM
Creation date
7/2/2020 3:02:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
7/7/2020
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
l
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution for the 2020 Distressed County Sales and Use Tax Infrastructure Improvement Program Agreement with the City of Ellensburg
Order
12
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
64177
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Trail activities are the top most desired types of recreation activities. Given the time, money <br />and transportation, walking and biking for pleasure were the top two activities chosen by <br />respondents as those they would like to do most. <br />Respondents prefer paved trails and trails that link neighborhoods or connect to other trails. <br />Based on the questionnaire, respondents are most interested in developing more trails for <br />exercise and to increase non -motorized transportation options. A lack of safe trails and <br />connections was also the top reason why respondents aren't currently using trails. <br />Recreational trails are also popular. Respondents expressed a need to provide natural <br />surface trails for mountain biking and trail running. <br />Recreation Programs and Special Events <br />There is potential to increase recreation program participation. Although 54% of all <br />respondents responded that their household had used City -sponsored recreational programs <br />last year, many respondents were unaware of current offerings. In addition, a smaller <br />percentage of respondents indicated that members of their family had used City -provided <br />recreational programs in the last year compared to the 2002 survey. <br />There is interest in special interest programs. When asked what additional City -provided <br />recreation programs should be offered or expanded, respondents indicated a need for <br />outdoor/environmental programs (37%) and fitness classes (25%). The majority of <br />respondents also indicated they would or would consider paying more for these types of <br />programs. <br />Respondents expressed a need for more opportunities for children and families. Based on the <br />open-ended responses, many respondents felt that children and families are the most <br />underserved by recreation programs. <br />Future Improvements <br />Respondents prioritized upgrading and maintaining existing parks and facilities. Based on <br />outcomes of the questionnaire, 41% of respondents indicated a need to upgrade existing <br />parks followed by maintaining existing parks and facilities (28%). Based on open ended <br />responses, examples of facilities with an expressed need for improvement include the <br />Racquet Center, city pool, tennis courts and playground equipment. <br />New trails are the top priority if funding were available. Prioritizing a citywide trail system <br />was the top ranked option according to questionnaire outcomes. <br />There is interest in a multi-purpose community facility. The second most popular response <br />for prioritization if funding were available was a multi-purpose community facility. In <br />addition, respondents preferred several types of features to include in such a facility, tennis <br />or racquet courts. <br />Though respondents value parks and natural areas, adding or developing new parks and <br />natural areas are not as prioritized. 16% for developing new parks and only 13% of <br />respondents indicated that acquiring land for future parks was a desired future <br />improvement. <br />Respondents prefer that funding and maintenance for parks and recreation is a shared <br />responsibility. Outcomes highlighted that funding should stem mostly from tax dollars and <br />some user fees. In addition, respondents prefer that private groups continue to share sports <br />field maintenance with the city. Fewer indicated that no fees should be charged or that the <br />city should develop and maintain sports fields and leagues without support. <br />Page 231 <br />Cit) n/ Ellensbwg Par" & Pe reoticn Systzm ComprEnensive Plon Update 2019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.