Laserfiche WebLink
Fact Sheet 2.1— Who's Covered? Designation and Waivers of Regulated Small M54s Page 3 <br />® Potential Designation by the NPDES Permitting <br />Authority — Physically Interconnected <br />Under the final rule, the NPDES permitting authority was <br />required to designate any small MS4 located outside of a UA <br />that contributes substantially to the pollutant loadings of a <br />physically interconnected MS4 regulated by the NPDES <br />stormwater program. The final rule did not set a deadline for <br />designation of small MS4s meeting this criterion. <br />Physically interconnected means that one MS4 <br />is connected to a second MS4 in such a way that <br />it allows for direct discharges into the second <br />system. <br />State and EPA permitting authorities can be contacted to <br />obtain a full list of regulated MS4s, including both the <br />automatically designated MS4s and those that were <br />additionally designated. <br />Are Waivers from the Phase II Permit/Program <br />Requirements Possible? <br />es, two waiver options are available to operators of <br />automatically designated small MS4s if discharges do not <br />cause, or have the potential to cause, water quality impairment. <br />The first applies where: <br />(1) the jurisdiction served by the system is less than 1,000 <br />people within the urbanized area; <br />(2) the system is not contributing substantially to the <br />pollutant loadings of a physically interconnected <br />regulated MS4; and <br />(3) if the small MS4 discharges any pollutants identified as a <br />cause of impairment of any water body to which it <br />discharges, stormwater controls are not needed based on <br />wasteload allocations that are part of an EPA approved <br />or established "total maximum daily load" (TMDL) that <br />addresses the pollutant(s) of concern. <br />TMDLs are water quality assessments that <br />determine the source or sources of pollutants of <br />concern for a particular waterbody, consider the <br />maximum amount of pollutants the waterbody <br />can assimilate, and then allocate to each source <br />a set level of pollutants that it is allowed to <br />discharge (i.e., a "wasteload allocation"). Small <br />MS4s that are not given a wasteload allocation <br />would meet the third criterion above. <br />The second applies where: <br />(1) the jurisdiction served by the system is less than <br />10,000 people; <br />(2) an evaluation of all waters of the U.S. that receive a <br />discharge from the system shows that stormwater <br />controls are not needed based on wasteload allocations <br />that are part of an EPA approved or established TMDh <br />that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern or an <br />equivalent analysis; and <br />(3) it is determined that future discharges from the small <br />MS4 do not have the potential to result in exceedances <br />of water quality standards. <br />The NPDES permitting authority is required to periodically <br />review any waivers granted to MS4 operators to determine <br />whether any information required for granting the waiver has <br />changed. Minimally, such a review needs to be conducted once <br />every five years. <br />Can More than One MS4 in the Same Political <br />Jurisdiction Be Automatically Designated? <br />Yes. Since the final rule provides automatic coverage of all <br />small MS4s within a UA, the result would likely be <br />coverage of several governments and agencies with multiple, <br />perhaps overlapping, jurisdictions. For example, a city that is <br />located within a UA and operates its own small MS4 could be <br />designated alongside the State's department of transportation <br />(DOT) and the county's DOT if the State and county operate <br />roads that are within the borders of the city. All three <br />entities would be responsible for developing a stormwater <br />management program for the portion of their respective <br />MS4s within the city limits. In such a case, the permittees <br />are strongly encouraged to work together to form a unified <br />stormwater management program. <br />Who Is Responsible if the Small MS4 Operator <br />Lacks the Necessary Legal Authority? <br />Some regulated small MS4s may lack the necessary legal <br />authority to implement one or more of the required <br />minimum control measures that comprise the Phase II <br />stormwater management program. For example, a local <br />government that is a small MS4 operator may be in a State <br />that does not have an enabling statute that allows local <br />regulatory control of construction site runoff into the sewer <br />system. Another example is a State DOT that may not have the <br />legal authority to require and enforce controls on illicit <br />discharges into its system. In these situations the small MS4 is <br />encouraged to work with the neighboring regulated small <br />MS4s. As co -permittees, they could form a shared stormwater <br />management program in which each permittee is responsible <br />for activities that are within their individual legal authorities <br />and abilities. <br />