My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-03-12-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-20 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2018-03-12-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 2:00:27 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:56:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/20/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
43308
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary <br />The modeled Zone A approach has promise if applied carefully and if adequate time is provided <br />to complete each task. Unfortunately, numerous mistakes have been identified and need to be <br />addressed. The most significant are: <br />1. StreamStats must be applied with caution within Kktitas County because it frequently <br />underestimates discharges. Where it does, the proposed floodplain inundation <br />boundaries are likely too narrow. <br />2. Cross sections are frequently aligned incorrectly with the most common problem being <br />that the ends of the cross sections are turned up -valley creating a fictitious confined <br />floodplain. Where this occurs, the proposed flood inundation boundaries are likely much <br />too narrow. <br />3. Omitting bridge and culvert crossings simplifies the modeling effort but care must be <br />taken to estimate inundation limits in the vicinity of these crossings, something that has <br />yet to be done in the delineations provided. <br />4. Bank stations are frequently incorrectly positioned which leads to significant errors in <br />definition of the Manning's n values and therefore water surface elevation computations. <br />The Yakima River Zone AE model appears well constructed. The following significant issues <br />were identified: <br />1. A significant reduction in the 100 -year discharge is proposed over the value used in the <br />effective study. This reduction may be valid, but WSE would like to review the hydrology <br />calculations for the proposed flows. <br />2. A number of cross sections are misaligned or contain date errors. <br />3. Ineffective flow areas need to be reviewed for continuity of down valley flow. <br />Referent <br />FEMA, 1981. "Flood Insurance Study: City of Cie Elum, City of South Cie Elum, City of <br />Ellensburg, Town of Kittitas, and Kittitas County, Washington". <br />WSE, 2015. "draft Corridor Plan: Yakima River Jeffries Levee to Yakima Canyon Habitat <br />Enhancement and Flood Risk Management Plan" <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.