Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY OF RID FORMULATION PROCEDURES <br />DEFINED BY REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON 36.88 <br />AND 35.43 <br />RCW 36.88.05 allows the use of the alternative method described in 35.43. <br />• 35.43.040 allows the use of RIDS for constructing public streets. 36.88.010 <br />allows the use of RIDs for improving private roads that will become county roads <br />following RID improvement. <br />• 36.88.030 requires a resolution stating the board's intent to form an RID. <br />• 35.43.070 creates an RID by Ordinance (board majority vote) following a <br />resolution to formulate. 36.88.040 requires an election by majority of votes cast. <br />• 35.43.130 defines RID boundaries and estimated costs. 36.88.080 does the <br />same thing and adds the proviso that no assessment is greater than the special <br />benefits derived. <br />• 35.43.140 requires publication two consecutive weeks with the last notice being <br />at least 15 days before the public hearing to formulate the RID. Notices are also <br />required to be mailed 15 days prior to the formulation hearing. 36.88.090 <br />requires notices be mailed to all RID participants and that all notices be <br />published two times in the newspaper of general circulation. <br />• 35.43.180 stipulates that the RID is null if 60% of the total cost of the RID say <br />NO. 36.88.100 allows for Superior Court review. <br />Biggest differences: <br />35.43 - No election required. 36.88 - An election is required. <br />35.43 — Good to go if less than 60% of the total cost of the RID object. 36.88 is <br />appealable to Superior Court. <br />Unknown requiring more evaluation Does 35.43 avoid the need to appraise for <br />benefit? <br />