Laserfiche WebLink
<br />06/06/2017 MINUTES 6 <br /> <br /> <br />At 11:30 a.m. Chairman Jewell announced the Board would recess back into <br />Executive Session for 10 minutes relating to agency enforcement actions, <br />or to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or <br />potential litigation to which the agency, the governing body, or a <br />member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a <br />party, when public knowledge regarding the discussion is likely to <br />result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency. <br />Possible action anticipated. Possible action anticipated. <br /> <br />At 11:40 a.m. the Board reconvened out of Executive Session. No action <br />was taken. <br /> <br />At 11:40 a.m. Chairman Jewell announced the Board would recess back into <br />Executive Session for 5 minutes relating to agency enforcement actions, <br />or to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or <br />potential litigation to which the agency, the governing body, or a <br />member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a <br />party, when public knowledge regarding the discussion is likely to <br />result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency. <br />Possible action anticipated. Possible action anticipated. <br /> <br />At 11:45 a.m. the Board reconvened out of Executive Session. <br /> <br />The Board directed the Prosecutors office to go to the next step of <br />filing an appeal with the Superior Court against the State Liquor & <br />Cannabis Control Board relating to GMA and issuing permits in direct <br />contradiction to local zoning regulations. They felt it was in the best <br />interest of the public to do so as the agency has been fast and not <br />taking into consideration of what the law states. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Brien moved to support pursuing legal action against the <br />State Liquor & Cannabis Control Board by route of the Superior Court. <br />Commissioner Osiadacz seconded. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> <br />There was discussion relating to vesting and perimeter fencing for the <br />current marijuana producers located in the rural areas which was allowed <br />under previous land use regulations. Commissioner O’Brien expressed his <br />opposition to changing those which were vested. Chairman Jewell said he <br />was not necessarily in favor of producers, but in order to be fair as <br />long as they stay within their original perimeters and status quo, there <br />would not be a motion needed at this time by the Board. <br />