Laserfiche WebLink
KITTITAS COUNTY <br />DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />STUDY SESSION DATE: March 27, 2017 <br />TOPIC: Flood Control Zone District Proposed Management Systems <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Direct Staff proceed implementing the selected <br />management system <br />LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Implement the Board's preferred Flood Control Zone District management system. <br />BRIEFING SUMMARY: <br />• A decision making model is needed to rank/prioritize and implement a Capital <br />Facility Plan (CFP) for the Flood Control Zone District <br />• The Board of County Commissioners can act as a "strong Board" or utilize a rate <br />payer advisory board (a third model may exist but is not considered in this <br />briefing). <br />• Each model has advantages and disadvantages. <br />• An abbreviated summary of pros and cons for each model appears below for <br />consideration. <br />Action <br />Stron Board <br />Rate Paver Adviso <br />Develop ranking criteria <br />Pro: Minimal special <br />Pro: Maximizes <br />interest group influence. <br />inclusion of rate payer <br />Con: Not inclusive. <br />interest. <br />Con: Time consuming. <br />Apply ranking criteria to <br />Pro: Only three required <br />Pro: Insulation for Board <br />possible projects <br />to develop consensus. <br />decision making <br />Con: Not inclusive. <br />reflecting rate payer <br />values. <br />Con: Time consuming. <br />Build the CFP <br />Pro: Quick. <br />Pro: Insulation for Board <br />Con: Subject to constant <br />decision making. <br />influence from special <br />Con: Time consuming <br />interest groups. <br />process. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />