My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-09-minutes-public-hearing-proposed-temporary-moratorium-on-applications-for-major-alternative-energy-systems
>
Meetings
>
2017
>
03. March
>
2017-03-21 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2017-03-09-minutes-public-hearing-proposed-temporary-moratorium-on-applications-for-major-alternative-energy-systems
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:44:41 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:44:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/21/2017
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
35566
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
03/09/2017 MINUTES 2 <br />proposed moratorium. RYAN WILLIAMS reviewed Initiative 937 which was <br />approved in November 2006. He said there was nothing in code that <br />prohibits solar farms in Kittitas County. He was against a <br />moratorium and encouraged the Board to abandon the idea. ERIN <br />ANDERSON opposed the proposed moratorium and said solar power <br />warrants support in the County. She felt solar power was a benefit <br />to citizens and land owners should be able to utilize their land. <br />She encouraged the Board to look at an overlay zone and identify <br />substations. DOUG DICKENS didn’t understand why the Board would <br />delay solar farms and felt land owners should be able to put them on <br />their property if they chose. He said solar and wind energy is the <br />future whether people like it or not and didn’t feel it should be <br />held up as it’s beneficial for the citizens. PATTY CLERF, <br />REPRESENTING HERSELF AND SAVE OUR FARMS explained how farmlands are <br />a critical resource which needs to be protected. She encouraged the <br />Board to continue the moratorium for 6-months to allow citizens to <br />come together for a proposed overlay which could be functional for <br />everyone involved. THERE BEING NO OTHERS REQUESTING TO TESTIFY, THE <br />PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER O’BRIEN moved to set a six-month moratorium on major <br />alternative energy systems in order to develop policy and explore <br />all other issues involved. COMMISSIONER OSIADACZ seconded. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER O’BRIEN expressed concerns relating to making a long <br />term decision and having affects to the rural character. He said the <br />County has gone through a long, expensive process to protect the <br />rural character by GMA and didn’t believe there would be any <br />hardship done with the moratorium. COMMISSIONER OSIADACZ expressed <br />support of a six month moratorium. She said it does not mean there <br />is no possibility of solar facilities in the future, but she would <br />like to invest in researching locations where they would be <br />beneficial to all stakeholders including businesses, landowners & <br />citizens. She stated agriculture lands were also clean energy farms <br />and there is a need to protect them as well. <br /> <br />DOC HANSEN, PLANNING OFFICIAL AND DAN CARLSON, CDS DIRECTOR provided <br />the review process that they would be going through if the six-month <br />moratorium was approved by the Board of Commissioners. They also <br />reviewed the work that’s already been conducted. <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN JEWELL said he has talked with people relating to potential <br />developments and doesn’t believe the code contemplated that type of <br />impact. He supports solar energy development but it’s a question of <br />where and how it’s done. He said he is also concerned with 5 <br />separate developments that have filed with EFSEC and could continue <br />regardless if moratorium or development regulations are in place. He <br />said there were risks however he believed it was important to take a <br />step back and have meaningful discussion with the community on <br />locations and to ensure there are minimal impacts to the rural
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.