Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Health Appeal Minutes <br />January 12, 2017 <br />3 of 4 <br />Mr. Elliott also agreed that these were reasonable requests. Commissioner Jewell looked at WAC <br />246-272A-0270 and did not find any prescriptive authority that says you need to report these <br />requirements to the local health department/jurisdiction, but there are several places where these <br />requirements are lifted right out of the WAC and are followed with: "where required by the local <br />health department/jurisdiction". Commissioner Jewell noted that he believes that the WAC <br />allows for enough flexibility and could be interpreted that the health department can require <br />these types of reporting requirements and supports keeping this requirement. <br />The last item up for discussion was the assessment for $9,626.84 to be assed jointly and severely <br />against MRT and its membership and the appellant objects. Mr. Elliott noted that he does not <br />think this is out of line with the regular practices of public health with re -inspection processes. <br />Commissioner Osiadacz briefly discussed and asked for clarification from the last meeting about <br />the timeline and when it was appropriate to start charging for staff time. Commissioner Jewell <br />reviewed Kittitas County Code 1375.060 that deals with abatement and the processes. The code <br />does specify that the county does have to go in and abate, and does not consider the process for <br />notice and inspections like the work that has been done here, and believes that is the appellant's <br />argument. The county's argument is that while it does talk about abatement, there is one line <br />that is a little more general that they are relying on. Commissioner Osiadacz stated that she <br />would be against the assessment piece due to not enough clarification in code. Commissioner <br />Jewell sides against the assessment piece, not because he doesn't think we should charge, but <br />because our code does not allow us to. Commissioner Jewell believes that the appellant is correct <br />that in code 1375.060 considers abatement costs only in the case of Health Order or other <br />abatement is required for follow through. The county would be correct if done under title 18 <br />action, but this is not the case. Commissioner Jewell will side against the assessment with <br />Commissioner Osiadacz. Commissioner Jewell also noted that the county could change the code <br />and does not think it is unreasonable to do so, especially when there is a large violation. <br />Commissioner Jewell asked how the board moves forward with appeal. Neil Caulkins, Kittitas <br />County Prosecuting Attorney, stepped to the microphone and noted that a decision on the appeal <br />makes the most sense. James Carmody, Mountain River Trails Representative, agreed. <br />Commissioner Jewell asked the group to take action on the following: <br />■ Violations are responsibility of Mountain River Trails Association: Commissioner Jewell noted <br />that the board will deny the appeal with regard to this issue. <br />■ Reporting requirements that were presented in Amendment # 1: the board will deny the appeal <br />with regard to this issue. <br />• Assessment of $9,600.00: the board will affirm the appeal and have staff prepare enabling <br />documents to memorialize that decision. <br />Commissioner Jewell asked for a motion. <br />Motion 01-01: Motion to deny the appeal with regard to overturning liability and it will remain <br />attached to Mountain River Trails Camping Association as the landowner; deny the appeal with <br />regard to reporting requirements as issued in the Heath Order Amendment #1; and affirmed <br />appeal in regards to the assessment of $9,600.00. Rich Elliott moved to deny the appeal with regard <br />to overturning liability and it will remain attached to Mountain River Trails Camping Association <br />