2016-06-13-minutes-public-works-study-session

Home Browse Search

• Digital hydrologic data consistent with the Data Capture Standards as described in the latest Technical Reference: Data Capture. • FIRM Database files as described in the FIRM Database Technical Reference, Table 2. • Metadata file complying with the latest Technical Reference: Metadata Profiles for Hydrology. • Digital Summary of Discharges Tables presenting discharge data for the flooding sources for which hydrologic analyses were performed (for flooding sources mapped as Zone AE on the FIRM). • Digital versions of draft text for inclusion in the FIS report. • Digital versions of all backup data used in the analysis including GIS data layers work maps. • A Hydrology Report summarizing the approach and results of the hydrologic analysis for each study area in Table 1.7. • A Summary Report that describes and provides the results of all automated or manual QA/QC review steps taken during the preparation of the FIRM as outlined in the approved QA/QC Plan. • Written certification that the digital data meet the minimum standards and specifications. • Written response to any comments resulting from the independent QA/QC review. • If data is changed following the independent QA/QC review, then updated deliverables for the Develop Hydrologic Data task must be submitted to the MIP. Develop Hydraulic Data The CTP may consider including and completing this task in the MIP if the UJF believes data will need to be submitted during the course of the project, even if this task was not included in the MAS. In addition, leveraged hydraulic data must be documented and submitted far this task. Failure to submit this task when data should have been submitted could result in the workflow being reverted back to production tasks and could lead to a delay in the schedule. If the CTP obtains hydraulic data that was not included in the MAS, the CTP shall contact the region to submit a change request to include the task and leverage as part of the award and request that this task be added to the MIP workflow. Responsible Mapping Partner: Kittitas County Public Works Scope: The CTP shall perform hydraulic analyses as described in Table 1.8: Summary of Hydraulic Data. Hydraulics analysis activities include establishing and reviewing regulatory floodways and flood elevations for the 10%, 4%, 2%, 1%, "1% plus" and 0.2% annual chance events based on flood discharge rates computed under Develop Hydrologic Data. Streamflow data collected at priority stream reach locations is used during hydraulic model calibration. The hydraulic methods used for this analysis may include base level and detailed level hydraulic modeling. The base level will use an automated hydraulic model, and use the best available elevation data. It will not include field surveys, floodways, or mapped Base Flood Elevations (BFEs). The detailed level may include field surveys, floodways, and the 10%, 4%, 2%, 1 %, 1 % plus and 0.2% annual chance events, using methods described in Table 1.8. National FY16 Flood Risk Project MAS Template Version 1.0 Mapping Activity Statement No. (MASNo 1 13