My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
10. October
>
2016-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
32188
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Hearings <br />iii-oduc$ion <br />Cities should do their absolutebesttowork with property owners toresolve their concerns. Even <br />Where a city works closely with property owners, a lawsuit may be filed, despite the city's best <br />efforts. Statutory limitations and fairness to other property owners prevent a city from granting <br />all of a property owner's demands. Formation hearings and final assessment roil hearings should <br />be conducted with possible litigation ?n mind. Formal rules of quasi-judicial procedure should be <br />formulated and distributed well In advance of the hearings to the council and LID participants, <br />In the final assessment roll hearing, the city council acts as a board of equalization to consider <br />evidence presented by both staff and property owner as to the correctness of the assessment <br />for each parcel. The final assessment roll hearing must be fair, open, impartial and structured. <br />Both hearings maybe held before the full city council, a committee thereof ora hearings officer <br />(examiner) (RCW 35.43,140). The following discussion under "Making Your Record" applies to <br />all three instances. <br />Making Your Record - Orchestration for Litigation <br />Introduction <br />Despite the best efforts of all involved — administrators, engineers, attorneys, and city officials <br />— sooner or later a city will face the wrath of a property owner disgruntled with some aspect of <br />an LID. A lawsuit will be filed. Therefore, every formation hearing and final assessment roll <br />hearing should be conducted with an eye toward litigation. The city should takethose reasonable <br />steps within its power to enhance its chances of winning a property owner's LID lawsuit. The <br />discussion which follows outlines a number of steps which can be taken in anticipation of <br />litigation. <br />During the life of every LID, there are two hearings. The first hearing occurs when the city is <br />contemplating ordering public improvements that are to be financed by LID assessments. <br />(RCW 35.43.140; 35.43.150) A second hearing usually occurs afterthe improvements have been <br />ordered and actually constructed. This is the hearing to confirm the finai assessment roll and the <br />assessment levied against the individual owner's property. (FiCW 35.44.070-35.44.120) Lawsuits <br />by property owners are normally filed after the hearing to confirm the final assessment roll. <br />Because lawsuits challenging the formation of a local improvement district are rare, these <br />materials will concentrate on steps to be taken to confirm successfully the final assessment roll. <br />Local and Road Improvement Districts Manual far Washington Stste Sixth Edition 59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.