My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
10. October
>
2016-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
32188
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issuance costs for the LID bonds: <br />a bond counsel <br />a underwriting <br />e rating and insurance, if rated or insured <br />a bond printing <br />• official statements and continuing disclosure <br />o closing <br />If there is any doubt as to whether a cost should or legally can be included, check with the <br />financing team members, particularly bond counsel and the financial advisor. Some costs may <br />be customarily absorbed by individual municipalities. That is an individual choice. <br />ProtecUng a MunicipalAys funds <br />If property owners fail to make assessment payments, the municipality may be required to draw <br />on the guaranty fund or reserves to make debt payments. If the guaranty fund is depleted, the <br />municipalitywill be required to replenish the fund unless the ordinance or resolution underwhich <br />the bonds were issued provides otherwise. Since foreclosure actions can take several years, <br />there may be a significant threat of default on the bonds if provisions are not made to secure the <br />bonds with the guaranty fund or a reserve. Underwriters will likely demand that a sufficient <br />reserve or the guaranty fund be pledged to the payment of the bonds and that provision for <br />replenishment of the guaranty fund or reserve be in force. Default is not acceptable. Default is <br />a dirty word, which can affect the general credit of the municipality, even though it was not <br />technically or legally liable for the debt repayment. <br />To avoid default, it may be necessary to use funds of the municipalityto make payments until the <br />guaranty fund or reserve can be replenished or foreclosure proceeds have been obtained. <br />Consideration of this possibility should be made in the formation stages of the LID process. There <br />are several ways the municipality can protect itself from such occurrences. These include among <br />others: <br />• Increase the size of the existing guaranty fund or reserve using financing proceeds <br />(backed by the assessments) or municipal funds; <br />• Avoid LIDs with single or few property owners; <br />• Avoid LI Ds with largely undeveloped properties; <br />• Only create LIDs in which properties have a high assessed or market valuation to <br />assessment ratio; <br />• Create stiff penalties for assessment delinquencies; <br />• Have a reputation for aggressively collecting and foreclosing; <br />• Avoid projects that are too big and expensive. <br />Statutes have been created which affect the establishment and use of the guaranty fund for an <br />LID. Prior to the formation of the LID, the use of the guaranty fund should be determined and the <br />appropriate 'egai language for its use established. Bond counsel should provide this advice <br />Local and Road Improvement Qistricts Manual for Washington State Sixth Edition 47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.