My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
10. October
>
2016-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
32188
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
necessary in order to avoid delaying the hearing. Once the city presents information in the fora <br />of an appraisal opinion, it is then a matter of decision by the city council as to which opinion of <br />special benefit should prevail. <br />The city council has authority to revise or amend the proposed final assessment roll as it sees fit. <br />(RCW 35-44.1 OC) However, if any assessment is raised or if there is a need to include an omitted <br />property not previously on the roll, the property owners are entitled to new notice and a new <br />hearing as if no hearing on the final rcli ever occurred. Those parties originally on the final roll and <br />whose assessments were not raised will have no opportunity to object at a later hearing. <br />(RCW 35.44.120) <br />Downward adjustment to any of thefinal assessments will require additional money from another <br />source to make up for the reduced assessment. The difference could be made up from public <br />funds; or the difference could be made up by reassessing the remaining property owners in the <br />LID, which would require a new hearing and additional costs, including additional interest and <br />notification costs. <br />The entire city council makes the final determination without taking additional testimony. <br />Variations of the assessment roll confirmation hearing process, such as using a hearing examiner <br />or city council committee, should only be done after consulting with legal counsel. The <br />assessment roll is approved by the majority of the city council by ordinance. As with the <br />formation ordinance, the assessment roll ordinance should be prepared by, or reviewed and <br />approved by, bond counsel. Procedures for submittal of the confirmation ordinance to the city <br />council should, if possible, allow for final action on the ordinance to occur at the same meeting <br />as and immediately following the assessment roll hearing. <br />Post Assessment Roll Wearing Actions and Appeals <br />After the final assessment roll is confirmed by ordinance, the roll is transmitted to the city <br />treasurer for collection. On the effective date of the confirmation ordinance, a 10 -day appeal <br />period begins to run. (RCW 35.44.120) During this period, only those property owners who have <br />filed timely written objections to the final roll may appeal to Superior Court. (RCW 35.44.190-270) <br />Upon expiration of the appeal period, the treasurer will publish and mail notice that the <br />assessment roll is filed for collection. The notice states that the property owners have an <br />opportunity to pay all or part of their assessments without interest. This is called a "pre -pay or <br />interest-free" period. If all property owners pay their assessments during the 30 -day interest free <br />period, no LID bond financing would be needed because there would be no unpaid balance. <br />Typically, there is a balance still owing after the pre -pay period. <br />If the final cost includes a financing fee (discount fee), any property owner paying all, or any <br />portion, of the assessment during the pre -pay period should be rebated, deducted or forgiven <br />that portion of the assessmentthat represents the financing fee. The bonds will be sold after the <br />pre -pay period. Since the amount of the financing fee that the city will pay is based on the actual <br />amount of the bond, assessments that are prepaid are not generating any financing fees. The <br />result, then, is a need to treat prepaid assessment differently than amortized assessments. Itis <br />appropriate (but not necessary) to provide this information in the pre -pay notice to the property <br />owners. <br />Lanai and Road Improvement Districts Manual for Washington State Sixth Edition 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.