Laserfiche WebLink
Practice Tp <br />Usually it is unwise to provide individual cost information at this point of development of an LID. This is especially <br />true where a detailed engineering design, environmental reviews, and a financial report have not been <br />completed; when the formula or type of method (frontfoot, square foot, special benefit, etc.) for cost distribution <br />has not been determined; when a more complex cost distribution formula or method will be used (such as zane- <br />termini); or when a combination of methods will be used. It is not necessaryto include an individual hreakdown <br />of costs on the petition, because the petition is principally used to measure the desire for the improvement in <br />the proposed LID area. <br />The LID administrator and relevant experts should meet with small groups of property owners <br />to explain the LlD process and the proposed project. if the owners of a substantial majority of <br />the area of affected properties sign the informal petition, and if the petition represents a <br />substantial majority of the probable total assessments, an LID formation attempt will likely <br />succeed. If not, it is a good idea to solicit more signatures before proceeding or ascertain <br />support through more informal meetings. <br />Tracking costs (of both in-house staff and outside consultants) should begin as soon as the <br />project seems to be feasible, because costs incurred before formation of the LID may be <br />reimbursed bythe LID. There are occasions when an agency, usually a small city, will require that <br />LID proponents pay for all or part of the LID formation costs. The proponents in this type of up <br />front funding are usually a few large property owners who are more interested in development <br />than solving problems. <br />Practice Tip <br />Because the proponents have paid money to form the LID, they will assume that they have unbridled access to <br />staff, the LID administrator and the design team. In addition they will expect their special interests to be met. <br />In this case, it is suggested that a detailed agreement be made between the proponents and the Agency as to <br />how the proponents' participation and suggestions are to be considered, and then be prepared for plenty of <br />interference. <br />Formation Process <br />Applicable Statrfts <br />As explained In Chapter 1 the LI O process for cities and towns is extensive and detailed, The LID <br />process for other municipalities, such as water -sewer districts and port districts, is based on the <br />process for cities and towns, with some procedural variations. This chapter describes the LID <br />process for cities and towns. The LID administrator must review carefully the LID statutes for the <br />type municipality involved, and compare it to this chapter. <br />Cast Estimates and Preliminary Assessment Roll <br />In preparation for the LID formation hearing, more detailed cost estimates must be made. This <br />should be done by the project engireerandthe LID administration team, The clerk -treasurer or <br />finance director and an investment banker are usually necessaryto assist in compiling all of the <br />24 Local and Road Improvement Districts Manual for Washington State Sixth Edition, <br />