My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
10. October
>
2016-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
32188
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. The two hearings held in the course of the proceedings are for different <br />and distinct purposes to which they should be limited, and both can be <br />conducted with reasonable decorum. <br />7. Anticipate possible litigation and make a record adequate for judicial <br />review of both formation and assessment proceedings. <br />B. Executive sessions durirg meetings or hearings may serve proper public <br />purposes, preserve confidentiality and protect the interests of the city. <br />9. AN requirements of the applicable statutes and any local procedural <br />ordinances or regulations should be strictly and timely satisfied. <br />10. The appearance of fairness should be maintained, conflicts of interest <br />should be disclosed and exp communications should be avoided. <br />V. The Importance of Informing the Public and Promoting Confidence <br />1. Philosophy and perspective <br />"While we are bound to conclude the actions of the <br />respondent were legally proper when viewed in light of the <br />trail court's findings, we cannot help but reflect upon the <br />fact that legally proper action may, nevertheless, needlessly <br />cause anger, dismay and antagonism on the part of citizens <br />affected." <br />State ex rel. Neuert v. Alderwood Water District, 1 Wn.App. 480, 482, 462 <br />P.2d 948 (1969). <br />Actions to take <br />a. Plan and prepare carefully and thoroughly. <br />b. Make reasonably full and timely disclosures of important details to <br />the public <br />C. Assure that all such information is correct and consistent <br />3. Potential practical advantages <br />a. Fewer questions and less misunderstanding <br />b. Reduced opposition and protests <br />C. Increased credibility and acceptance <br />4. Conclusion <br />Procedure for establishment of local improvement districts and <br />determination of special assessments is well defined. Although <br />there are potential traps for the unwary, careful reading and <br />compliance with the detailed statutory provisions provide adequate <br />protection for property owners. Ample provision is made for <br />participation and protests by those affected. On the other hand, <br />the procedure enables the city to proceed with necessary <br />improvements in an expeditious manner. <br />Trautman, Suora. at 132 <br />50368141. i <br />16 Local and Road Improvement Districts Manual for Washington State Sixth Edition <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.