My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
10. October
>
2016-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
32188
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Legal Summary <br />Special Benefit Assessment Financing <br />A. Some Basic Concepts <br />1. Fundamental Requirements <br />a. Express statutory authority <br />[A] municipal corporation's powers are <br />limited to those conferred in express terms <br />or those necessarily implied. In re Seattle. <br />96 Wash.2d 616, 629, 638 P.2d 549 (1981). <br />... The test for necessary powers is legal <br />necessity rather than practical necessity. <br />Hillis Homes— Inc. v. Snohomish Cir.,, 97 <br />Wash.2d 604, 808, 650 P.2d 193 (1982). As <br />we stated in }M : "[i]f the .Legislature has <br />not authorized the action in question, it is <br />invalid no matter how np=sary it might be. <br />[Emphasis added.] <br />Chemical Bank v. WPPSS, 99 Wn.2d 772, 792, 666 P.2d <br />329. <br />b. Compliance with legal procedures <br />"Where a person or board is charged by <br />law with a specific duty and the means for <br />its performance are appointed by law, there <br />is no room for implied powers, and the <br />means appointed must be followed, <br />however inadequate _mav_be the result." <br />[Emphasis in original.] <br />State ex. rel Eastvold v. Maybury, 49 Wn.2d 533, 539, 304 <br />P.2d 663 (1956). <br />2. Public improvements can confer both general benefits and special benefits <br />on property in the community. <br />3. Property in Washington may be assessed for the special benefits conferred <br />by the installation of certain public improvements. The special benefit <br />assessment process has been authorized and implemented in moststates <br />for many years. See,14 McQuillin, Municipal Cor orations §38.02 (3rd <br />Ed.) <br />Washington cities and towns may form local improvement districts (Lips) <br />or utility local improvement districts (ULIDs) as authorized by RCW <br />36.43.04C and .042. <br />Local and Road Improvement Districts Manuel for Washington State Sixth Edition 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.