My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
10. October
>
2016-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
32188
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is also available. Several agencies have provided MRSC with samples, so there ?s no need to <br />develop your own from scratch. <br />Participants in the LID process include property owners and the general public, public wcrks staff, <br />finance department staff, the city clerk, the mayor, council, city attorney, investment bankers, <br />underwriters, financial advisors, engMeerslarchitects, real estate appraisers and bond counsel. <br />One person on staff must be designated as the LID administrator. This person should not be a <br />department head simply because of the amount of detail work required. The LID administrator <br />can certainly have other duties, bit should not be overloaded. Training is important. Computer <br />skills are essential, particularly in electronic spreadsheets and word processing. Superhuman <br />powers are useful, as leaping over tal: buildings to escape irate property owners may be <br />necessary. Depending on the c::lture of the agency, staff avaiiability and capabilities, it is <br />common to have a consultant be the LID administrator and/or the LID advisorand public relations <br />manager. <br />LIDS Don't Have to Create Hardships <br />Of legitimate concern are low income senior cit;zens and those who are economically <br />disadvantaged. No ccuncilperson wants to vote for a project that will put someone out of their <br />home. Two types of assessment deferrals are referenced in the statutes. Chapter 84.38 RCW <br />provides for assessments to be deferred indefinitely for qualified senior citizens. RCW35.43.250 <br />and 36.54. 100 provide for a deferral of up to four years for economically disadvantaged property <br />owners, as defined in the formation ordinance. In both of these cases, the deferred assessment <br />does not go away, but becomes a lien against the property. Other options for property owner <br />relief may be available. <br />Deferrals and other options for relief should be publicized early in the process, with a concerted <br />effort made to identify those who may need such relief. Elected officials also need to know these <br />options so that they can advise citizens who may contact them. Reference these options in the <br />public hearings and enter any documentation available regarding your efforts to identify property <br />owners eligible for deferrals. <br />CID assessments Are Subject to Strict Criteria <br />Statutes require that the assessment per parcel must not exceed the special benefit of the <br />improvement to that parcel, which is defined as the difference between the fair market value of <br />the property before and after the local improvement project. In addition, the assessments must <br />be proportionate to one another. A corollary to these principles is that property not benefitted <br />by the improvements may not be assessed. No matter what assessment method is used — per <br />parcel, front foot, area, zone termini, traffic volumes, special benefit appraisal, etc the courts <br />will be concerned only with these criteria. Even if a project lends itself very wel Ito a front footage <br />assessment (i.e., uniform lots, similar zoning) or is not large enough to warrant a full-blown <br />special benefit analysis, it is wise to check a few strategic parcels with a limited appraisal. This <br />will prevent unpleasant surprises atthe final assessment roll hearing. <br />LID Final Assessment Roll Hearings Are Quasi-Judidel <br />Cities should do their absolute best to work with property owners and resolve their concerns. <br />Lawsuits will happen despite a city's best efforts to do so. Statutory limitations and fairness to <br />other property owners prevent a city from giving in to an individual property owner's every <br />demand. Formation hearings and fina' assessment roll hearings should be conducted with <br />4 Local and Road Iruprovernent Districts Manual for Washington State Skth Edrilon <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.