My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-11-minutes-it-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
07. July
>
2016-07-19 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-07-11-minutes-it-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:30:13 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
7/19/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
30716
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 29, 2016 Page 1 of 4 <br />Kittitas County Information Technology <br />New Application Development Criteria <br />This guide is designed to facilitate conversations and introduce questions on choosing the appropriate <br />software solution provider. It does highlight certain conditions where Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) <br />will be required, but generally hopes to introduce advantages and disadvantages of both options so an <br />informed decision can be made together. <br />Background <br />COTS <br />A commercial solution may refer to either something that is available immediately via a purchase online <br />or store, or an enterprise‐based solution where a vendor will provide some site‐specific customizations <br />and installation services. The latter will often be handled through a project manager working with staff <br />to schedule various aspects of a comprehensive installation including data conversion, deployment, <br />configuration, and training; whereas the former will just require minimal coordination with IT to <br />purchase and install the software on the desired workstations and servers. <br />After the implementation is complete, the vendor (if available) and county often enters into a <br />maintenance contract, providing an agreed upon amount of support and product upgrades. <br />Occasionally, additional charges for certain upgrades or higher levels of support or training will apply. <br />In‐house development <br />With in‐house development, IT and the department(s) involved will meet several times to plan the exact <br />specifications and features that are to be in this solution. Often times, connections to existing county <br />systems are possible and integrated, resulting in a more unified approach and greater functionality as <br />additional in‐house solutions are brought online. Support issues and bug reports are handled internally, <br />often by the very developers who planned the system initially. <br />Pre‐requisites <br />Some solution requirements will exclude an in‐house approach from being considered. If the project <br />meets any of the following requirements, an external provider must be chosen: <br /> Handles mission/business‐critical function(s) <br /> Special handling (HIPPA, CJIS, PCI) involved (Data Classification 4) <br /> Data conversion from legacy, proprietary systems is needed <br />Similarly, to consider in‐house development the project must meet these criteria: <br /> Must affect more than one person, or be a major function of a person’s duties and is connected <br />to another existing system. <br /> Must be used by all staff performing the functions provided by the application
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.