Laserfiche WebLink
nhc <br />conditions model best replicates the flood inundation that Is experienced by the property owners, the <br />hydraulic model can then be used to compare this baseline condition to the proposed project condition. <br />4.2 Model Results <br />The following sections provide a summary of the flood rise analysis hydraulic results for the existing and <br />proposed conditions along lick Creek. The County requested water surface elevations during the 2- and <br />100 -year flow to allow WDFW to assess potential impacts due to the project The 2 and 100 -year USGS <br />regression equation peak flows are provided In Appendix A. All results are In the NAVD88 datum. <br />�..�., i -Year Flow <br />Figures A-1 and A-2 in Appendix A provide water surface elevations during the estimated 2 -year peak <br />flow (70 cis) for the existing and proposed conditions, respectively. Figure A-3 provides a comparison of <br />water surface elevations between the proposed and existing conditions to show how the proposed <br />Project may effect water surface elevations along Lick Creek. In general, there is minimal to no change <br />In water surface elevations outside of the County right of way, through the private properties, as shown <br />by the white color In Figure 1-3. There Is a reduction in water surface elevations upstream of the <br />existing NF Teanaway Road culverts due to their removal as well as the additional conveyance provided <br />by the proposed 40 -foot bridge. Immediately downstream, and through the realigned portion <br />(approximately 325 feet downstream of the proposed crossing) of Lick Creels there is an Increase in <br />water surface elevations (shown as red In Figure A-3) due to the proposed alignment currently being dry <br />in the existing conditions. This area, based on historic aerial photos, Is one of the historic alignments of <br />Lids Creek. <br />4.2.2 100 -Year Flow <br />Figures A-4 and A-5 In Appendix A provide water surface elevations during the estimated 100 -year peak <br />flow (270 cfs) for the existing and proposed conditions, respectively. Figure A-6 provides a comparison <br />of water surface elevations between the proposed and existing conditions to show how the proposed <br />project may effect water surface elevations along Lick Creek. <br />During existing conditions (Figure A-4 In Appendix A), the two NF Teanaway Road culverts do not have <br />sufficient capacity to pass the estimated 100-Vrear peak flow without having backwater. This backwater, <br />located upstream of the culverts, results In the forest service road on the southwest bank of Lick Creek <br />to overtop (Figure 4-1). The 2D hydraulic model estimates approximately 44 cis overtopping the forest <br />service road, with the remainder of flow being conveyed through the two existing NF Teanaway Road <br />culverts. As the flow overtops the forest service road, It follows a ditch along the west side of NF <br />Tearaway Road, crossing several private driveways and overtops the NF Teanaway Road In two locations <br />(Figure A-4). For modeling purposes, the model domain ended just south of culvert 9 in Figure 2-3 as the <br />topography south of this area increases in elevation, thus directing the water to the north and <br />overtopping the NF Teanaway Road back into Lick Creek, These locations of overtopping were <br />confirmed based on discussions with Klttltas County staff, property owners, and evidence of erosion on <br />the east side of the NF Teanaway Road embankment during the April 12th, 2019 site volt (Figure 4-2). <br />North Fork Teanaway Road - Lick Creek Fish Passage Enhancement Project <br />Flood Rise Analysis — Maintalning Creek Flows Along Teanaway Road <br />