Laserfiche WebLink
100 —� <br />.j <br />10 <br />i <br />1 <br />0.1 <br />J <br />I <br />0.001 <br />100 <br />B <br />I L IL <br />i000 10000 <br />Figure 5: Computed Relationship Between Flow and Bedload Transport Rate. The Solid Line Represents <br />a Floodplain Roughness Value of n=0.05, While the Dashed Lines Indicaee Results using Values <br />of rpo0.025 and nwO.08. <br />HYDROLOGIC AND BANK EROSION IMPACT OF REALIGNMENT <br />The expected hydrologic impact of realigning Lick Creek was quantified by applying USGS regional <br />regression relations, per the County's request, Regressions were completed for three separate basins <br />and are listed in Table 1. Because of the contribution of localized precipitation and offsets in the timing <br />between peak flows on the mainstem and tributaries, flood peaks scale less than proportionally to the <br />basin area. This is reflected In the regresslon relations, as the exponent on basin area is less than 1. <br />Potential impact of Lick Creek relocation on the NF Teanawray River Morphodynarnics <br />