Laserfiche WebLink
nhc <br />During the modeled proposed conditions (Figure A-5 in Appendix A), the backwater (due to the existing <br />two NF Teanaway Road culverts) is eliminated and thus no overtopping of the forest service road occurs. <br />This is due to the increased conveyance from the proposed 40 -foot bridge, which will meet WDFW water <br />crossing design guidelines to allow for natural stream processes and unimpeded fish passage. While the <br />proposed design restores the natural drainage path of Lick Creek, it increases the flow ("'44 cfs during <br />the estimated USGS 100 -year flow and unobstructed culverts) downstream compared to existing <br />conditions due to flow no longer overtopping the forest service road and flowing down the west NF <br />Teanaway Road ditch. This increase in flow has some effect on the water surface elevations through the <br />private properties. The highest increase in water surface elevation is approximately 0.4 feet nearthe <br />inlets of the private property culverts. This suggests that the private driveway culverts may have not <br />been designed to convey the 100 -year flow without overtopping, which is not uncommon for low <br />volume roads or privately owned crossings. It is unlikely that any of the culverts in the model domain <br />were designed based on the attenuation that upstream culverts may have, as engineering standard <br />practice is to design water crossings for steady-state, peak flow conditions. With this said, the <br />preliminary hydraulic model results provide graphics as a way to continue discussions with the property <br />owners and to discuss potential changes to Lick Creek due to restoring the natural drainage path, stream <br />processes and unimpeded fish passage through the NF Teanaway Road crossing. <br />Figure A-6 in Appendix A shows a reduction in water surface elevations upstream of the existing NF <br />Teanaway Road culverts due to the additional conveyance provided by the proposed 40 -foot bridge. <br />Similar to the 2 -year results, immediately downstream and through the realigned portion (approximately <br />325 feet downstream of the proposed crossing) of Lick Creek, there is an increase in water surface <br />elevations (shown as red in Figure A-6) due to the proposed alignment currently being dry in the existing <br />conditions. This area, based on historic aerial photos, is one of the historic alignments of Lick Creek. The <br />other red areas throughout Lick Creek are also representative of locations where the 100 -year estimated <br />flow did not inundate (was dry) during existing conditions. As mentioned above, the highest increases in <br />water surface elevations (approximately 0.4 feet) compared to existing conditions are near the private <br />driveways, likely due to the culverts not being designed to convey the 100 -year flow without backwater. <br />In general there is no increase in water surface elevations downstream of culvert 3 (shown in Figure 2-3). <br />This is due to all of the flow in existing conditions being in Lick Creek, as the flow in the west NF <br />Teanaway Road ditch overtops and re-enters Lick Creek upstream of this location. <br />5 CONCLUSION <br />This technical memorandum summarizes the hydraulics assessment that was completed to assist WDFW <br />in assessing whether they will take actions to support the County's original proposed project to afford <br />protections and streamlined permitting for fish barrier removal projects through RCW 77.55.181, The <br />hydraulic model developed, as part of this flood rise analysis, is a tool which can be utilized to assess <br />changes in hydraulic characteristics due to changes in hydrology or assumptions of existing or proposed <br />infrastructure. This assessment provides the requested information from WDFW, allowing discussions <br />with stakeholders to assess project goals and communicate potential changes due to the NF Teanaway <br />Road fish enhancement project. <br />North Fork Teanaway Road - Lick Creek Fish Passage Enhancement Project <br />Flood Rise Analysis — Maintaining Creek Flows Along Teanaway Road <br />13 <br />