Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 8. DAM FAILURE <br />8-10 <br />8.4. CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS <br />Potential changes to the hydrographs used to design dams due to the impacts of climate change are a <br />growing concern for the safety of our nation’s dams. Dams are designed partly based on assumptions about <br />a river’s flow behavior, expressed as hydrographs. As this is based on historical data, dams are not designed <br />to be forward looking. Climate change is expected to create more variable temperatures and precipitation <br />events, and dams are not prepared to handle the expected fluctuations in the water supply. <br />Changes in weather patterns can have significant effects on the hydrograph used for the design of a dam. If <br />the hygrograph changes, it is conceivable that the dam can lose some or all of its designed margin of safety, <br />also known as freeboard. If freeboard is reduced, dam operators may be forced to release increased volumes <br />earlier in a storm cycle in order to maintain the required margins of safety. Such early releases of increased <br />volumes can increase flood potential downstream. Throughout the west, communities downstream of dams <br />are already experiencing increases in stream flows from earlier releases from dams. <br />Dams are constructed with safety features known as “spillways.” Spillways are put in place on dams as a <br />safety measure in the event of the reservoir filling too quickly. Spillway overflow events, often referred to <br />as “design failures,” result in increased discharges downstream and increased flooding potential. Although <br />climate change will not increase the probability of catastrophic dam failure, it may increase the probability <br />of design failures. <br />8.5. EXPOSURE <br />An exposure analysis for dam failure was performed using dam inundation maps provided by Kittitas <br />County, and building data from the Kittitas County Assessor. Structures and their respective total values <br />(building and contents) are identified as at-risk if they are exposed to at least one of the inundation areas. <br />Structures may be exposed to more than one dam failure inundation area but are not identified as part of <br />this assessment. Data utilized for this assessment included the following datasets: <br />– Cle Elum Dam Failure Inundation Area; <br />– Easton Dam Failure Inundation Area; <br />– Kachees Dam Failure Inundation Area; and <br />– Keechelus Dam Failure Inundation Area. <br />8.5.1 Population <br />All populations in a dam failure inundation zone are exposed to the risk of a dam failure. Using GIS, <br />residential structures that intersect the combined dam inundation area were identified, and an estimate of <br />population was calculated by multiplying the number of residential structures by the Kittitas County <br />average of 2.32 persons per household. Using this approach, the estimated population living in the mapped <br />inundation areas is 4,417, or 12 percent of the county’s population. Table 8-3 summarizes the at-risk <br />population in the planning area by city. <br /> <br />Table 8-3. Population At Risk From Dam Failure <br />Jurisdiction Affected Population % of City Population <br />Cle Elum 1,111 62.2% <br />Ellensburg 722 7.7% <br />Kittitas 0 0% <br />Roslyn 0 0% <br />South Cle Elum 522 94.5%