Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />ES-4 <br />MITIGATION INITIATIVES <br />For the purposes of this document, mitigation initiatives are defined as activities designed to reduce or <br />eliminate losses resulting from natural hazards. The mitigation initiatives are the key element of the hazard <br />mitigation plan. It is through the implementation of these initiatives that the planning partners can strive to <br />become disaster-resistant through sustainable hazard mitigation. <br />Although one of the driving influences for preparing this plan update was continued grant funding <br />eligibility, its purpose is more than just access to federal funding. It was important to the planning <br />partnership and the steering committee to look at initiatives that will work through all phases of emergency <br />management. Some of the initiatives outlined in this plan are not grant eligible—grant eligibility was not <br />the focus of the selection. Rather, the focus was the initiatives’ effectiveness in achieving the goals of the <br />plan and whether they are within each jurisdiction’s capabilities. <br />This planning process resulted in the identification 174 mitigation actions to be targeted for implementation <br />by individual planning partners. These initiatives and their priorities can be found in Volume 2 of this plan. <br />In addition, the steering committee and the planning partnership identified a series of countywide initiatives <br />benefiting the whole partnership that will be implemented by pooling resources based on capability. These <br />countywide initiatives are summarized in Table ES-1. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Full implementation of the recommendations of this plan update will take time and resources. The measure <br />of the plan’s success will be the coordination and pooling of resources within the planning partnership. <br />Keeping this coordination and communication intact will be the key to successful implementation of the <br />plan. Teaming together to seek financial assistance at the state and federal level will be a priority to initiate <br />projects that are dependent on alternative funding sources. This plan was built upon the effective leadership <br />of a multi-disciplined steering committee and a process that included public input and support. The plan <br />will succeed for the same reasons. <br />