My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019_KittitasCountyHMP_Volume 1_For Adoption
>
Meetings
>
2019
>
09. September
>
2019-09-03 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2019_KittitasCountyHMP_Volume 1_For Adoption
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2019 12:06:14 PM
Creation date
8/29/2019 12:02:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
9/3/2019
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
l
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution to Adopt the 2019 Kittitas County Hazard Mitigation Plan as Approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
Order
12
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
56110
Type
Resolution
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 11. FLOOD <br />11-12 <br />and property. Another element that characterizes a community’s flood threat is the length of time <br />floodwaters remain above flood stage. <br />The Kittitas County flood threat system consists of a network of precipitation gages throughout the <br />watershed and stream gages at strategic locations on the Yakima River that constantly monitor and report <br />stream levels. This information is fed into a USGS forecasting program, which assesses the flood threat <br />based on the amount of flow in the stream (measured in cubic feet per second). In addition to this program, <br />data and flood warning information is provided by the National Weather Service. All of this information is <br />analyzed to evaluate the flood threat and possible evacuation needs. <br />Due to the sequential pattern of meteorological conditions needed to cause serious flooding, it is unusual <br />for a flood to occur without warning. Warning times for slow-rise floods can be between 24 and 48 hours. <br />Flash flooding can be less predictable, but potential hazard areas can be warned in advanced of potential <br />flash flooding danger. <br />11.3. SECONDARY HAZARDS <br />The most problematic secondary hazard for flooding is bank erosion, which in some cases can be more <br />harmful than actual flooding. This is especially true in the upper courses of rivers with steep gradients, <br />where floodwaters may pass quickly and without much damage, but scour the banks, moving the edge of <br />the floodplain closer to buildings or causing them to fall in. Flooding is also responsible for hazards such <br />as landslides when high flows over-saturate soils on steep slopes, causing them to fail. Hazardous materials <br />spills are also a secondary hazard of flooding if storage tanks rupture and spill into streams, rivers or storm <br />sewers. <br />There are various public health concerns that arise as a result of exposure to flooded areas, including <br />drowning, infectious diseases from contaminated floodwaters, exposure to chemical hazards, electrical <br />hazards from downed power lines, and injury from objects carried by flood waters (CDC, 2017). Mold <br />growth is a common occurrence in flood-damaged homes and damp environments. Mold can also spread if <br />it is disturbed during the clean-up process, as it is transferred from one surface to another. Infants, children, <br />immune-compromised patients, pregnant women, individuals with existing respiratory conditions <br />(allergies, multiple chemical sensitivity, and asthma) and the elderly appear to be at higher risks for adverse <br />health effects from mold. Symptoms include nose and throat irritation, wheezing, coughing, asthma attacks <br />in individuals who have asthma, and lower respiratory tract infections (in children). People with pre - <br />existing respiratory conditions also may be susceptible to more serious lung infections (FEMA 2010). <br />11.4. CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS <br />Use of historical hydrologic data has long been the standard of practice for designing and operating water <br />supply and flood protection projects. For example historical data are used for flood forecasting models and <br />to forecast snowmelt runoff for water supply. This method of forecasting assumes that the climate of the <br />future will be similar to that of the period of historical record. However, the hydrologic record cannot be <br />used to predict changes in frequency and severity of extreme climate events such as floods. Going forward, <br />model calibration or statistical relation development must happen more frequently, new forecast-based tools <br />must be developed, and a standard of practice that explicitly considers climate change must be adopted. <br />Climate change is already impacting water resources, and resource managers have observed the following: <br />• Historical hydrologic patterns can no longer be solely relied upon to forecast the water future. <br />• Precipitation and runoff patterns are changing, increasing the uncertainty for water supply and <br />quality, flood management and ecosystem functions.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.