My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019_KittitasCountyHMP_Volume 1_For Adoption
>
Meetings
>
2019
>
09. September
>
2019-09-03 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2019_KittitasCountyHMP_Volume 1_For Adoption
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2019 12:06:14 PM
Creation date
8/29/2019 12:02:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
9/3/2019
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
l
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution to Adopt the 2019 Kittitas County Hazard Mitigation Plan as Approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
Order
12
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
56110
Type
Resolution
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 9. DROUGHT <br />9-8 <br />Table 9-1. Kittitas County Vulnerability to Drought <br />Criterion Value for <br />Kittitas County <br />Meets Drought <br />Vulnerability <br />Criterion? <br />Percent of Time in Serious or Extreme Drought, 1895 – 1995 10 – 15 Yes <br />Irrigated Cropland (acres) 91,944 <br />Statewide Ranking for Irrigated Cropland Area 7 Yes <br />Percent of Harvested Cropland That Is Irrigated 137.8% <br />Statewide Ranking for Irrigated Cropland Percentage 1 Yes <br />Market Value of Crops $38,432,000 <br />Statewide Ranking for Market Value of Crops 18 Yes <br />Population Growth, 2000 – 2006 12.1% Yes <br />Median Household Income $34,669 Yes <br />Unemployment Rate 20% Greater Than State Average No No <br /> <br />9.6.1 Population <br />The planning partnership has the ability to minimize any impacts on residents and water consumers in the <br />county should several consecutive dry years occur. No significant life or health impacts are anticipated as <br />a result of drought within the planning area. <br />9.6.2 Property <br />No structures will be directly affected by drought conditions, though some structures may become <br />vulnerable to wildfires, which are more likely following years of drought. Droughts can also have <br />significant impacts on landscapes, which could cause a financial burden to property owners. However, these <br />impacts are not considered critical in planning for impacts from the drought hazard. <br />9.6.3 Critical Facilities <br />Critical facilities as defined for this plan will continue to be operational during a drought. Critical facility <br />elements such as landscaping may not be maintained due to limited resources, but the risk to the planning <br />area’s critical facilities inventory will be largely aesthetic. For example, when water conservation measures <br />are in place, landscaped areas will not be watered and may die. These aesthetic impacts are not considered <br />significant. <br />9.6.4 Environment <br />Environmental losses from drought are associated with damage to plants, animals, wildlife habitat, and air <br />and water quality; forest and range fires; degradation of landscape quality; loss of biodiversity; and soil
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.