RZ-07-00008 Dunford FDP Ordinance 2010-013

Home Browse Search

38. Any Conclusion of Law that is more correctly a Finding of Fact is hereby incorporated as such by this reference. (Hearing Examiner finding based on the record) II, RECOMMENDED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Hearing Examiner has been granted authority to render this recommended decision. 2. Final plat approval shall be conditioned upon compliance with the SEPA and code - related mitigation conditions listed under "Suggested Conditions of Approval." As conditioned, the development meets the goals, policies and implementation recommendations as set forth in the Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan. 4. As conditioned, this proposal is consistent with applicable federal and state laws and regulations. 5. Public use and interest will be served by approval of this proposal. 6. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with Kittitas County Code Title 16 Subdivision, Title 17 Zoning, Title 17A Critical Areas, Title 15 Environmental, and Title 12 Roads and Bridges. 7.. As conditioned, the proposed use is consistent with the intent, purposes and regulations of the Kittitas County Code and Comprehensive Plan. As conditioned, the proposal does conform to the standards specified in Kittitas County Code. 9. As conditioned, the use will comply with all required performance standards as specified in Kittitas County Code. 10. As conditioned, the proposed use will not be contrary to the intent or purposes and regulations of the Kittitas County Code or the Comprehensive Plan, 11. As conditioned, this proposal does comply with Comprehensive Plan, the Shoreline Master Program, the zoning code and other Iand use regulations, and SEPA. 12. Any Finding of Fact that is more correctly a Conclusion of Law is hereby incorporated as such by this reference. Z-07-08 and LL -08-02 Dunford PUD Rezone and Preliminary Large Lot Subdivision Page 17 of 28