Laserfiche WebLink
Filed for Record 04/16/2009 04:48:53 PM -Kittitas County, WA Auditor -200904160090 Page 94 of 118 <br />Cultural Resources. The EIS discusses adverse impacts to cultural resources and identifies <br />mitigation measures that should be implemented. Pursuant to Kittitas County SEPA Ordinance <br />Section 15.04.200(d), Comprehensive Plan Policy GPO 2.196, Section 2.2(C) and Policy 2.38, <br />and Shoreline Master Program goals, policies, use regulations and environment designations, the <br />following mitigation measures will be required. <br />C-21 Mitigation measures available to ensure protection of all significant cultural resources on <br />the MPR site, as identified in the EIS, and the traditional cultural property, include: (1) <br />avoidance; (2) limited testing to determine the significance and extent of properties deemed <br />potentially significant to the National Register of Historic Places; and (3) using approved cultural <br />resources plan, the placement of a protective overburden may be placed on top of known <br />significant properties creating an undisturbed barrier between the resource and development <br />activity; and (4) excavation to recover significant cultural information prior to negatively <br />impacting any National Register eligible properties. Avoidance of impacts to all previously <br />identified significant cultural resources can be obtained by establishing a 150-foot buffer around <br />known resource areas. If it is determined that avoidance of a resource area is not possible, <br />proposed construction or landscape alteration that intrudes into the prescribed buffer area shall <br />be conditioned on the applicant conducting archaeological subsurface testing. This testing will <br />be completed prior to any disturbance to adequately document the extent and potential of the <br />cultural resources for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. The applicant shall <br />consult with the Washington Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) and the <br />Yakama Nation to determine whether additional mitigation measures are necessary. The <br />applicant shall notify Kittitas County of the results of such investigation and consultation. <br />C-22 Prior to any disturbance to known significant resources areas, as identified in the Draft and <br />Final EIS Cultural Resources infonnation, an archaeological permit must be requested from <br />OAHP, State permission granted, and archaeological testing conducted to determine the <br />significance and extent of the cultural resource. Necessary mitigation measures are determined <br />after testing in consultation with the State OAHP and the Yakama Nation. <br />C-23 Prior to any land disturbing activities within identified cultural constraint areas steps will <br />be taken to ensure the protection of all potentially significant buried cultural resources. These <br />steps include: (I) a series of subsurface test probes shall be completed to ensure the <br />identification and protection of all significant buried cultural resources; or (2) using an approved <br />cultural resources plan, a protective overburden shall be placed on top of the cultural constraint <br />area creating an undisturbed barrier between any potential buried cultural resources and proposed <br />land disturbing activities. All cultural resources identified through such testing shall be protected <br />as outlined in Conditions C-21 and C-22 above. <br />Aesthetics, Light and Glare. The EIS discusses adverse impacts to aesthetics, light and glare <br />and identifies mitigation measures that should be implemented. Pursuant to Kittitas County <br />SEPA Ordinance Section 15.04.200(d), Comprehensive Plan Policies GPO 2.190, 2.191, 2.192, <br />2.194, 2.196 and 2.197, and the goals, policies, use regulations and environment designations of <br />the Shoreline Master Program, the following mitigation measures will be required. <br />Suncadia MPR Conditions of Approval <br />December 2, 2008 <br />Page26