Laserfiche WebLink
Filed for Record 04/16/2009 04:48:53 PM -Kittitas County, WA Auditor -200904160090 Page 92 of 118 <br />increase in traffic volumes above year 2000 baseline volumes identified in <br />Condition C-5. <br />f. The scope shall also include monitoring of non-holiday summer weekend parking <br />demand in Roslyn and Cle Elum. In addition, local travel patterns of MPR guests will be <br />documented through periodic origin/destination surveys. MPR trips shall be identified as <br />those trips that cross an MPR boundary. <br />g. The monitoring program shall also include a method to reevaluate the background growth <br />assumptions as described in Conditions C-5 and C-5A. <br />h. In addition to the traffic volume monitoring described in subsection (e), the monitoring <br />program shall also include proposed methods to monitor the following potential traffic- <br />related impacts: <br />i. a comparison of the historic road operation and maintenance needs and associated <br />costs prior to MPR construction and development as compared to current road <br />operation and maintenance needs and associated costs (including methods such as <br />review of pre-and post-development pavement management system costs) and the <br />extent to which projected increased revenues from the MPR development are <br />sufficient to cover such increased costs. This assessment may be included either as <br />part of the traffic monitoring program, or as part of a separate fiscal impact <br />monitoring program conducted for government facilities and services more <br />generally; <br />11. an evaluation, based on accepted guardrail warrant and/or other safety standards, of <br />whether the increased traffic volumes warrant installation of guardrails and/or other <br />safety improvements along portions of Bullfrog road; <br />iii. the need for road segment capacity improvements or new road segments related to <br />MPR traffic at locations other than the intersections previously identified. <br />iv. whether increased traffic volumes or the size or amount of construction traffic <br />related to the MPR development requires improvements to the Cle Elum River <br />Bridge on Bullfrog Road, based on accepted bridge rating standards. <br />v. the increase in aill)lane use of existing airport facilities (Bowers Field and the Cle <br />Elum airport) by MPR visitors to determine whether MPR visitors are generating a <br />need for facility improvements to accommodate increased aircraft use. <br />1. The monitoring program shall also include a periodic assessment of the pedestrian and <br />vehicular safety at the Cle Elum-Roslyn School campus on SR 903, and shall require <br />mitigation if determined necessary to meet accepted school safety standards. This <br />assessment shall include input from the School District on both the methodology and the <br />results. <br />j. The baseline monitoring information described in Condition C-5 shall be collected on <br />August 25 through September 4, 2000. Subsequent deadlines for monitoring shall be <br />established in the comprehensive traffic monitoring program to be adopted by the <br />County. <br />k. Each required monitoring report shall include, at a minimum, the following information: <br />i. results of any traffic counts <br />ii. development status of the MPR (approved units and occupancy) <br />111. comparison of MPR development and traffic counts to MPR-FEIS forecasts <br />1v. identification of completed and planned road improvements <br />Suncadia MPR Conditions of Approval <br />December 2, 2008 <br />Page 24