My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-2037 Comp Plan Update Enabling Ordinance with Exhibit A
>
Meetings
>
2019
>
06. June
>
2019-06-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2017-2037 Comp Plan Update Enabling Ordinance with Exhibit A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2019 1:20:58 PM
Creation date
6/13/2019 1:12:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
6/18/2019
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
h
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance Adopting the 2017-2037 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update and Associated Maps
Order
8
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
54424
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
413
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Chapter 8 RURAL AND RESOURCE LANDS <br />KITTITAS COUNTY <br />Page 97 Comprehensive Plan <br />Master Planned Resorts <br />The Master Planned Resort (MPR) designation applies to those lands that comprise a self-contained and fully <br />integrated planned unit development. MPRs are typically destination resort facilities consisting of short-term <br />visitor accommodations associated with a range of developed on-site indoor or outdoor recreational <br />facilities. A MPR may also include residential uses within its boundaries, but only if the residential uses are <br />integrated into and support the on-site recreational nature of the resort. A MPR may constitute urban growth <br />outside of urban areas as limited by these policies. <br />Kittitas County has a wide range of natural features, including climate, vegetation, water, resources, scenic <br />qualities, cultural, and geological features, which are desirable for a wide range of recreational users to enjoy. <br />MPRs offer an opportunity to utilize these special features for enjoyment and recreational use. MPRs can <br />bring significant economic diversification and benefits to communities, while at the same time enhancing <br />environmental values. MPRs can address these unique opportunities while maximizing retention of <br />environmental features, critical habitats, resource lands, and other critical features. MPRs can be located and <br />planned in ways that do not detrimentally affect projected growth scenarios in urban growth areas and <br />limited areas of more intense rural development (LAMIRDs). MPRs should be designed to stand alone, by not <br />requiring adjacent areas to develop land uses to support the resort use. Recognizing these factors, policies <br />guiding the location and development of MPRs must consider varied and unique criteria. <br />MPRs may be approved in the County in accordance with: (1) RCW 36.70A.360 or .362 Master planned resorts, <br />as amended; (2) County Comprehensive Plan policies; and (3) County Development Regulations. For general <br />guidance purposes, the County MPR policies rely upon the June 1994 “Master Planned Resorts Draft <br />Comprehensive Plan Policy Guidance” prepared by the Washington State Department of Community, Trade <br />and Economic Development Task Force. <br />Following are the policies pertaining to Master Planned Resorts in Rural Areas: <br />RR-P64: MPRs should have a thorough review process prior to being located or designated and such review <br />process should be phased, consistent, specific, and timely. <br />RR-P65: A MPR will be planned and designed by looking at the entire site or area and adjacent lands and <br />communities. <br />RR-P66: A MPR should be designed in context with its surrounding environment, natural and man-made. A <br />MPR should not adversely affect surrounding lands in any significant way. <br />RR-P67: A variety of urban residential densities should be included in a MPR site design, providing efficient, <br />compact residential land use. Residential uses may include single-family detached lots and multi-family and <br />attached residential structures. Clustering of residential units in a manner that preserves open space is <br />strongly encouraged. Overall MPR density shall not exceed an average of one unit per acre. Non-urban <br />residential densities are appropriate within a MPR if they promote and are linked to the on-site recreational <br />features and value of the resort. <br />RR-P68: A MPR application should include a clear and detailed mapped description of how the development <br />phases of the MPR fit together. Estimated timelines for site development, building construction and all <br />necessary public and private capital facilities, utilities, and services should be provided.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.