Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Chapter 8 RURAL AND RESOURCE LANDS <br />KITTITAS COUNTY <br />Page 85 Comprehensive Plan <br />RR-P5: Protecting and preserving resource lands shall be given priority. Proposed development allowed <br />and adjacent to resource lands shall be conditioned to protect resource lands from negative impacts from <br />that development. <br />RR-P6: Allow for lands which offer adequate supply of rock and gravel resources located in areas compatible <br />for such uses and conditioned so that operation does not negatively impact rural character. <br />RR-P7: Policies will be consistent with Kittitas County’s “right to farm” ordinance, 17.74 KCC. <br /> RURAL LANDS <br /> Introduction <br />Kittitas County’s rural land use designation consists of a balance of differing natural features, landscape <br />types, and land uses. Rural land uses consist of dispersed and clustered residential developments, farms, <br />ranches, wooded lots, and agricultural and recreational/commercial and industrial uses that serve local, <br />national and international populations as customers. Rural landscapes encompass the full range of natural <br />features including wide open agriculture and range land, forested expanses, rolling meadows, ridge lines and <br />valley walls, distant vistas, streams and rivers, shorelines and other critical areas. <br />Rural lands exhibit a vibrant and viable landscape where a diversity of land uses and housing densities are <br />compatible with rural character. “Rural character,” as identified through scientific research over the past two <br />decades, indicates that residents of rural communities, homebuilders, and planners see it in various ways <br />depending upon the community and the rural area. This research demonstrates that “rural character” is not <br />identical in all areas and must be determined by communities. Overall, the research shows that “rural <br />character” is best determined by concepts existing within the community such as existing densities and <br />building materials (Tilt, et. al., 2006), “nature-related areas” particularly having forest, not just trees, and open <br />spaces related to the community (Kaplan, Austin, 2004, 2003, and 2001), and “natural amenities and <br />perception of recreational and (individual community) residential development” (Mascouriller, 2002). Study <br />shows that cluster development, when used not to increase density creating suburban or urban-like <br />environments, are most marketable, and preserve “open spaces” desired by communities and potential <br />residents most effectively of all development <br />techniques at this time (Burney, 2006 and Lacey, <br />1990). <br />Kittitas County residents, through an extensive publi c <br />involvement process in 2012, provided descriptions of <br />“rural” that they wish to preserve. Such descriptions <br />include many of the conclusions presented by <br />scientific research including, “natural open spaces and <br />streams,” “forests,” “recreational opportunities and <br />spaces,” “agriculture lands and activities,” “mountain <br />views,” and “development away from urban areas.” <br />These descriptions capture the essence of “rural