Laserfiche WebLink
+.-2. <br />2. <br />3 . <br />repol1s, and have a reasonable opportunity (in no case less than fifteen days) to <br />comment on their sufficiency before such repo11s shall be considered final. Final <br />archaeological survey repol1s shall be filed with DAHP prior to the County 's issuance <br />of a permit, exemption, or other approval where the proposed project is not exempt <br />under Section 5.l(B)(l)(a). <br />e. Monitoring Alternative . Despite the requirements of Section 5 .l(B)(l)(c), above, an <br />archaeological survey shall not be required where the project proponent, the County, <br />DAHP, and any affected Native American tribes, all approve a written plan for on- <br />site project monitoring by a professional archaeologist throughout all project phases <br />that include ground-disturbing work. This monitoring plan shall be drafted by a <br />professional archaeologist at the applicant 's expense . <br />f. Proiec t Modification Alternative . Despite the requirements of Section 5 .1 (B)( I)( c ), <br />above, an archaeological survey shall not be required where the project is modified so <br />that it no longer triggers the risk factor(s) under 5. l(B)(l)(c) that would have resulted <br />in the need for an archeological survey under these regulations. <br />Inadverte nt Dis coveries. Developers and property owners shall immediately stop work <br />and notify the local government, the Washington State Department of Archaeology and <br />Historic PreservationDAHP , and affected lfHliaftN ative American tribes if archaeological <br />resources are uncovered during excavationdiscovered. Construction may recommence <br />pursuant to RCW 27.44.040, RCW 27 .53.040 and WAC 25-48-030 . A notification <br />stating this requirement shall be included on County shoreline ~ <br />exemptions, and other project approval documents. <br />Prior to issuance of a permit in areas documented to containR esource Managem ent. If <br />significant cultural-er_. archaeological, or historic resources, a cultural resources site <br />inspection or evaluation by are identified in the project area, the project proponent shall <br />engage a professional archaeologist shall be required in coordination with affected Indian <br />tribe&.- <br />If a cultu:ral resource site inspection or e¥aluation identifies the presence of significant <br />historic or arnhaeological resources , a cultural resource management plan shall be <br />prepared by a professional archaeologist or~ historic preservation management <br />professional:-, where appropriate) to prepare a resomce management plan . The resource <br />management plan shalL at a minimum , conform to DAHP 's then-current management <br />standards . In addition, a permit or other requirementsrequirement administered by the <br />Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic PreservationDAHP pursuant <br />to RCW 27.44 and RCW 27 .53 may apply. <br />Definitions to Add: <br />"Archaeological object" means an object that comprises the physical evidence of an indigenous <br />and subsequent culture, including material remains of past human life, including monuments, <br />symbols, tools, facilities, and technological by-products. <br />Page 5 of6