My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res-2019-030 Indirect Cost Allocation Plan
>
Meetings
>
2019
>
02. February
>
2019-02-19 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Res-2019-030 Indirect Cost Allocation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2019 12:46:29 PM
Creation date
2/25/2019 12:45:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/19/2019
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
c
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution adopting the 2019 Central Services Simplified Indirect Cost Allocation Plan for the Year Ended December 31, 2017, Effective January 1, 2019
Order
3
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
51515
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Direct Salaries & Wages -the 2017 fiscal year end salaries & wages for each department <br />Excluded Costs -Certain items of cost are classified by Uniform Guidance as extraordinary o r <br />distorting expenditures and are excluded from the computation of the indirect cost rate i.e . <br />capitalized equipment. <br />Indirect Costs -costs incu r red for a common or joint purpose benefit ing more than one cost <br />objective <br />Ind irect Cost Rate - a devise for determining in a reasonable manner the proportion of indirect <br />costs each program should bear. It is the rat io of the indirect coast to a direct cost base . <br />Sub Department -additional breakdown of a department expenses for accounting purposes <br />Total Costs -the 2017 fiscal year end actual expenses <br />Unallowable Costs -Certain items of cost are classified by Uniform Guidance as unallowable, <br />which means that federal funds cannot be used for those items of cost. For indirect cost <br />rate calculation; however, these unallowed costs are included in the base along with the direct <br />costs . Some examples for unallowed costs are : Governance, promotional advertising , <br />entertainment, and fines & penalties . <br />Uniform Guidance -United States Office of Management & Budget, 2CFR Part 200, Uniform <br />Administration Requirements , Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards <br />establishing principles and standards for determining costs for Federal awards carried out <br />through grants , cost reimbursement contracts , and other agreements with governmental un its . <br />FINANCIAL INFORMATION <br />Accounting <br />Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial <br />resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting . Revenues are <br />recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be <br />available when they are collect ible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay <br />liabil ities of the current period. <br />Audited Data <br />Kittitas County is audited annually by the State Auditor's office. The audits consist of <br />Financial and Single Audit and the Accountabil ity Aud it. The Financial and Single Audit was <br />issued on September 27, 2018 , Report #1022280. The report stated : <br />We issued an unmodified opinion on the fair presentation of the financial statements of <br />the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund and the <br />aggregate remaining fund information in accordance with accounting principles generally <br />accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). <br />Internal Control over Financial Reporting: <br />• Significant Deficiencies: We reported no deficiencies in the design or operation of <br />internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be significant <br />deficiencies. <br />• Material Weaknesses: We identified no deficiencies that we consider to be <br />material weaknesses. <br />We noted no instances of noncompliance that were material to the financial statements <br />of the County. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.