Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 of 6 <br />reports, and have a reasonable opportunity (in no case less than fifteen days) to <br />comment on their sufficiency before such reports shall be considered final. Final <br />archaeological survey reports shall be filed with DAHP prior to the County’s issuance <br />of a permit, exemption, or other approval where the proposed project is not exempt <br />under Section 5.1(B)(1)(a). <br /> <br />e. Monitoring Alternative. Despite the requirements of Section 5.1(B)(1)(c), above, an <br />archaeological survey shall not be required where the project proponent, the County, <br />DAHP, and any affected Native American tribes, all approve a written plan for on- <br />site project monitoring by a professional archaeologist throughout all project phases <br />that include ground-disturbing work. This monitoring plan shall be drafted by a <br />professional archaeologist at the applicant’s expense. <br /> <br />f. Project Modification Alternative. Despite the requirements of Section 5.1(B)(1)(c), <br />above, an archaeological survey shall not be required where the project is modified so <br />that it no longer triggers the risk factor(s) under 5.1(B)(1)(c) that would have resulted <br />in the need for an archeological survey under these regulations. <br /> <br />1.2. Inadvertent Discoveries. Developers and property owners shall immediately stop work <br />and notify the local government, the Washington State Department of Archaeology and <br />Historic PreservationDAHP, and affected IndianNative American tribes if archaeological <br />resources are uncovered during excavationdiscovered. Construction may recommence <br />pursuant to RCW 27.44.040, RCW 27.53.040 and WAC 25-48-030. A notification <br />stating this requirement shall be included on County shoreline permitpermits, <br />exemptions, and other project approval documents. <br /> <br />2. Prior to issuance of a permit in areas documented to containResource Management. If <br />significant cultural or, archaeological, or historic resources, a cultural resources site <br />inspection or evaluation by are identified in the project area, the project proponent shall <br />engage a professional archaeologist shall be required in coordination with affected Indian <br />tribes. <br /> <br />3. If a cultural resource site inspection or evaluation identifies the presence of significant <br />historic or archaeological resources, a cultural resource management plan shall be <br />prepared by a professional archaeologist or(or a historic preservation management <br />professional., where appropriate) to prepare a resource management plan. The resource <br />management plan shall, at a minimum, conform to DAHP’s then-current management <br />standards. In addition, a permit or other requirementsrequirement administered by the <br />Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic PreservationDAHP pursuant <br />to RCW 27.44 and RCW 27.53 may apply. <br /> <br /> <br />Definitions to Add: <br /> <br />"Archaeological object" means an object that comprises the physical evidence of an indigenous <br />and subsequent culture, including material remains of past human life, including monuments, <br />symbols, tools, facilities, and technological by-products.