Laserfiche WebLink
a.f. Project Modification Alternative. Despite the requirements of Section 5.1(B)(1)(c), above, <br />an archaeological survey shall not be required where the project is modified so that it no <br />longer triggers the risk factor(s) under 5.1(B)(1)(c) that would have resulted in the need <br />for an archeological survey under these regulations. <br /> <br />2. Inadvertent Discoveries. Developers and property owners shall immediately stop work and <br />notify the local government, the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic <br />PreservationDAHP, and affected Indian Native American tribes if archaeological resources are <br />uncovered during excavationdiscovered. Construction may recommence pursuant to RCW <br />27.44.040, RCW 27.53.040 and WAC 25-48-030. A notification stating this requirement shall <br />be included on County shoreline permit permits, exemptions, and other project approval <br />documents. <br />3. Prior to issuance of a permit in areas documented to containResource Management. If <br />significant cultural or, archaeological, or historic resources, a cultural resources site inspection <br />or evaluation by are identified in the project area, the project proponent shall engage a <br />professional archaeologist shall be required in coordination with affected Indian tribes.If a <br />cultural resource site inspection or evaluation identifies the presence of significant historic or <br />archaeological resources, a cultural resource management plan shall be prepared by a <br />professional archaeologist or(or a historic preservation professional, where appropriate) to <br />prepare a resource management plan. The resource management plan shall, at a minimum, <br />conform to DAHP’s then-current management standards. In addition, a permit or other <br />requirements requirement administered by the Washington State Department of <br />Archaeology and Historic PreservationDAHP pursuant to RCW 27.44 and RCW 27.53 may <br />apply.