Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 2 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Proposed Action and Alternatives <br /> PAGE 2-34 <br />construction, the appropriate interim noxious weed control measures discussed in the Noxious Weed and <br />Invasive Plant Management Plan will be implemented until revegetation can occur. <br />2.2.4.5 Emergency Response <br />The operation of the transmission system is remotely managed and monitored from control rooms at <br />PacifiCorp’s operation center in Portland, Oregon. Electrical outages or variations from normal operating <br />protocols would be sensed and reported at this operation center. As well, the substations are equipped <br />with remote monitoring, proximity alarms, and, in some cases, video surveillance. <br />The implementation of routine operation and maintenance activities on transmission lines would <br />minimize the need for most emergency repairs. Emergency maintenance activities are often those <br />activities necessary to make repairs after natural hazards, fire, or man-caused damages to a transmission <br />line. Such work is required to eliminate safety hazards, prevent imminent damage to the transmission line, <br />or to restore service in the event of an outage. In the event of an emergency Pacific Power would respond <br />as quickly as possible to restore power. <br />The necessary equipment for emergency repairs is similar to that necessary to conduct routine <br />maintenance. However, on occasion, additional equipment may be required. For example, where the site <br />of the outage is remote, helicopters may be used to respond quickly to emergencies. In practice, as soon <br />as an incident is detected, the control room dispatchers would notify the responsible operations staff in the <br />area(s) affected and crews and equipment would be organized and dispatched to respond to the incident. <br />Pacific Power would notify the appropriate agency contacts or private landowner regarding the <br />emergency and required access to carry out the emergency repairs. Although restoration of the <br />transmission line would have priority, every effort would be made to protect crops, plants, wildlife, and <br />resources of importance. <br />2.2.5 Underground Transmission Line Design <br />Details on the design, construction and maintenance, as well as disturbance assumptions for the two route <br />segments of the NNR Alternative analyzed for underground transmission line construction are discussed <br />in this section. The NNR Alternative - Underground Design Option was analyzed for two route segments <br />in this FEIS and is not a feature common to all Action Alternatives. <br />2.2.5.1 Underground Construction Components and Construction Technologies and <br />Techniques <br />Underground construction techniques considered in this FEIS are based on industry standards and <br />methods used on other transmission line projects. Due to the lack of similar projects in this region, this <br />FEIS considers industry methodology developed in highly urbanized areas. This methodology may differ <br />substantially from the methodologies that may be used for this proposed Project. However, geography, <br />land uses, and physiographical conditions were different in many cases (e.g., highly urbanized areas) from <br />those that are found in the Vantage-Pomona Heights Project area. Pacific Power has not in the past and <br />does not currently construct, operate, or maintain any 230 kV underground transmission lines in their <br />service area (Oregon, Washington, and California) and none have been constructed by other utilities in a <br />similar setting (rural, undeveloped sage-brush dominated land) in this region. The description of the <br />construction components, technologies, methods, and disturbance assumptions are based on other projects <br />implemented by utilities that have installed 230 kV underground facilities elsewhere in the United States. <br />Locations for undergrounding considered in this FEIS occur along two route segments: NNR-4u and <br />NNR-6u (see Figure 2-3). Section 2.4.1 describes the location and Design Options considered in the <br />analysis for each of the route segments. A permanent 30-foot ROW corridor would be required for the <br />duct bank and adjacent access road.