My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 2 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Proposed Action and Alternatives <br /> PAGE 2-28 <br />For all helicopter activities, the construction contractor would work with the appropriate federal, state, <br />and local agencies to ensure that the appropriate notifications are made to coordinate the air space with <br />other possible aircraft and helicopters in the area being used for military training, fire support, or other <br />use. <br />2.2.3.8 Construction Yards/Staging Areas and Fly Yards <br />Several construction yards/staging areas, roughly five acres each, would be required for materials and <br />equipment storage and staging and helicopter operations (fly yard) for construction activities. Possible <br />locations would be identified during preliminary engineering design. All possible areas would be located <br />on existing disturbed areas, and locations would be approved by land owner or land management <br />agencies. The yards would serve as field offices, reporting locations for workers, parking space for <br />vehicles and equipment, and sites for temporary marshalling of construction materials. <br />2.2.3.9 Marking of Sensitive Areas <br />All sensitive areas, biological and cultural, would be marked on drawings and in the field prior to <br />construction to ensure protection and avoidance of these areas according to resource protection plans in <br />the POD. Marking in the field would consist of wooden stakes, which would be spray painted the same <br />color (e.g., high visibility blue) for all sensitive areas. The stakes would represent general avoidance <br />areas; no distinction between biological and cultural sites would be made. The marking would take place <br />prior to construction. A preconstruction walk with the construction contractor and appropriate agency <br />and/or tribal entities would be conducted to identify avoidance areas in the field. After construction is <br />complete in an area or when it has been determined there is no longer a threat to important biological and <br />cultural resources, the stakes would promptly be removed to protect the sites location and significance <br />from gaining unwanted attention and/or damage. <br />2.2.3.10 Erosion and Sediment Control <br />Erosion and sediment control may be necessary to prevent soil erosion in construction areas located on <br />hillsides where a road to access a structure location or a leveled area is required to allow equipment set-up <br />for pole installation. Applying and maintaining standard erosion and sediment control methods would <br />minimize erosion. These may include weed-free straw wattles, weed-free straw bale barriers, and silt <br />fencing which would be placed at construction boundaries. Gravel ramps may be installed at access points <br />to public roadways, as needed, to prevent or minimize the tracking of mud, dirt, sediment, or similar <br />materials onto paved roadways. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will be included in the POD. <br />Erosion control structures such as waterbars, diversion channels, terraces, and slope roughening may be <br />constructed if determined to be necessary to divert water and reduce soil erosion along the ROW corridor <br />or other areas disturbed by construction where slopes exceed 30 percent. Selection of appropriate erosion <br />control materials would be based on soil properties, steepness of slope and anticipated surface flow or <br />runoff, and would be detailed in the proposed Project’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). <br />Existing vegetation would be preserved to the maximum extent practicable during all phases of <br />construction. Vegetation clearing would be kept to a minimum and occur only where construction plans <br />call for it. <br />All disturbed areas would be re-seeded using a seed mixture as specified by the appropriate land <br />management agency and best management practices for erosion control. Re-seeding would occur during <br />the appropriate season(s) for successful establishment of new vegetation. On slopes greater than 30 <br />percent, additional measures such as organic fiber mulching, geo-textile fabrics, and sod mats may be <br />used. Specific erosion and sediment control measures and locations would be specified in a SWPPP.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.