Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 2 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Proposed Action and Alternatives <br /> PAGE 2-11 <br />Turn-around areas may be required in certain areas where construction travel would be restricted by rock <br />outcrops, washes, ravines, or sensitive areas. Turn-around areas would typically require a temporary <br />disturbance area of 60 feet by 60 feet (3,600 sq. ft./0.08 acre). <br />Several material staging areas, roughly five acres each, would be required for material and equipment <br />storage and for staging construction activities. For the EIS analysis, it is assumed that sites for material <br />staging areas would be located on existing disturbed areas in areas approved by the landowner or agency. <br />However, material staging areas would be determined during detail design and may include undisturbed <br />areas, but preference would be given to currently disturbed sites. <br />Pacific Power’s proposed Project, as described above, is for overhead transmission line construction <br />(Overhead Design Option) which is considered feasible from the perspective of construction, operation, <br />maintenance, and cost by Pacific Power (e.g., overhead steel or wood, H-frame, or single pole structures). <br />In addition to the Overhead Design Option proposed by Pacific Power, this FEIS analyzes the option of <br />undergrounding two discrete route segments of the NNR Alternative. The Underground Design Option is <br />being analyzed in response to comments received from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and <br />Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) regarding potential Project impacts to Greater <br />Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, Sage-Grouse). The Underground Design Option is <br />technically feasible, but construction and maintenance costs are expected to be higher than the Overhead <br />Design Option. The impact analysis for the Underground Design Option is described and considered for <br />each resource in the FEIS. <br />Upgrades would also occur to Pacific Power’s Pomona Heights Substation and BPA’s Vantage <br />Substation, located at the proposed Project’s termini at the north and the south ends. <br />2.1.2 Pomona Heights Substation Upgrades <br />The new 230 kV transmission line would enter Pacific Power’s Pomona Heights Substation on the <br />northwest edge of the substation. All new equipment would be installed within the existing substation <br />fence. A new steel H-frame terminal structure would be required. New line breakers, new switches, <br />various bus connections and other minor equipment and wiring would be installed to incorporate the new <br />line into the interconnected regional electric transmission grid. <br />2.1.3 Vantage Substation Upgrades <br />The Vantage Substation is owned by BPA. A currently occupied bay would be vacated within the <br />substation for termination of the proposed new 230 kV transmission line. The proposed new transmission <br />line would enter the east area of the substation. BPA would design and install the new equipment to <br />interconnect the new 230 kV transmission line to the regional electric transmission grid. New substation <br />equipment would be installed within the existing Vantage Substation fence. <br />2.2 PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND FEATURES COMMON TO ACTION <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />2.2.1 Design Options Considered in the NNR Alternative Impact Analysis <br />Two design options were developed and analyzed to determine the potential impacts of the proposed <br />Project on resources identified in Chapters 3 and 4. These options are considered in this FEIS based on <br />the various design and construction techniques proposed. The two design options that are considered are: <br />1) Overhead Design Option and 2) Underground Design Option. Potential impacts of variations on the