My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> PAGE 4-159 <br />4.6 SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREAS <br />Impacts on special management areas (SMAs) could be created as a result of the construction, operation, <br />and maintenance of the Project. Impacts would be caused by the displacement or alteration of existing <br />uses or activities occurring within the SMA or conflict with legislative mandates, recognized values, <br />and/or goals, objectives, standards, and policies of the management documents or agencies. <br />4.6.1 Methods and Impact Types <br />4.6.1.1 Analysis Methods <br />The SMA impact methodology used was similar to those used to analyze land use resources and included: <br />• Identifying the types of Project effects on established or proposed SMA resources; <br />• Evaluating the intent of the designation and any specific legislative or planning directives <br />related to the current or proposed management of the established or proposed SMA; <br />• Developing criteria for assessing impact intensity; <br />• Assessing impacts considering the effectiveness of Required Design Features (RDFs); <br />• Introducing specific mitigation measures in specific locations to reduce impacts if possible; <br />and <br />• Evaluating residual impacts. <br />4.6.1.2 Impact Criteria <br />Impacts on SMAs were determined based on Project compatibility with the use of the area, legislative <br />mandates, recognized values, and/or goals, objectives, standards, and policies of the management <br />documents or agencies. <br />The potential change describes the physical changes that could potentially occur to a SMA use or activity, <br />or conflict with legislative mandates, recognized values, and/or goals, objectives, standards, and policies <br />of the management documents or agencies. Changes could be brought about by: <br />• Acquisition of land or property rights to accommodate the Project; <br />• Constructing the Project; <br />• The physical presence and operation of the Project; and <br />• Managing the right-of-way (ROW) and maintaining the Project. <br />The potential for change from introducing transmission line facilities differs from one SMA to another <br />with respect to what might be altered and to what extent. This potential for change is predicted by <br />evaluating the environmental conditions, the Project description, and RDFs. <br />4.6.1.3 Impact Types <br />Physical impacts to recognized values were assessed along the centerline of each of the route segments <br />for the inventoried established or proposed SMAs. The impact types identified along the centerlines of <br />Action Alternative route segments are characteristically direct and long-term and include any impact that: <br />• Displaces, alters, or otherwise physically affects any existing, established, or planned SMAs; <br />and <br />• Conflicts with legislative mandates, recognized values, and/or goals, objectives, standards, <br />and policies of the management documents or agencies.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.