Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> PAGE 4-140 <br />Overall, high impacts would total 4.6 miles and moderate impacts would total 13.4 miles for Route <br />Segment 3c. <br />4.4.4.11 Route Segment NNR-2 <br />Route Segment New Northern Route (NNR) 2 would cross approximately 5.0 miles of the perimeter of <br />the JBLM YTC resulting in long-term impacts. The extreme western perimeter of Training Area 13 would <br />be crossed between MP 0.0-1.1. Military operations in this area would be minimally affected because the <br />route segment would be on the perimeter of training activity areas and the new transmission line <br />structures would be located adjacent to an existing fire break road. Impacts would be moderate because <br />the area available for training activities would be reduced, although activities could continue to occur. <br />Moderate impacts would also occur on the parade field area of the route segment (MP 2.5-2.7) because a <br />portion of the field would be removed from use. This route segment also crosses land classified as <br />Farmland of Statewide Importance (1.3 miles) and Prime Farmland (2.5 miles) causing 3.7 miles of long- <br />term disturbance. However, this is non-agricultural land and impacts would be moderate. <br />The route segment would be in compliance with the Final Cultural and Natural Resources Management <br />Plan for the JBLM YTC. <br />Overall, moderate impacts would occur for 2 miles and low impacts would occur for 2.4 miles of this <br />route segment. <br />4.4.4.12 Route Segment NNR-3 <br />Route Segment NNR-3 crosses BLM, private, and WSDOT owned and managed ROW land. The existing <br />land use along this route segment is related to transportation facilities, special management, and <br />recreation. Transportation related land use is associated with I-82; the route segment crosses I-82 and is <br />adjacent to Selah Creek Rest Area. Special management and recreation areas are managed by the BLM <br />and DNR, and include Selah Cliffs NAP, Yakima Cliffs/Umtanum Ridge Area of Critical Environmental <br />Concern (ACEC) located between MP 3.3 and 4.3, Yakima Cliffs/Umtanum Ridge ACEC proposed <br />expansion located between MP 1.5 and 3.3, and the Selah Butte Watchable Wildflower Viewing Area. <br />Refer to Section 4-7 for impacts and necessary WSDOT approvals to cross I-82. The land use for a large <br />portion of the route segment is undeveloped rangeland and BLM grazing leases. There are two <br />Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) funded projects within the Project study <br />area: Selah Cliffs NAP Grant # 06-1827 and Selah Cliffs Grant #93-838. The Selah Cliffs Grant #93-838 <br />RCO site is not encumbered by development restrictions because no land has been acquired with grant <br />money. Selah Cliffs NAP Grant # 06-1827 is not crossed by the route segment. The Selah Cliffs NAP is <br />not crossed by the assumed centerline of this route segment and no land use impacts would occur on the <br />NAP. It is assumed there will be no aerial easement across the NAP; however, final engineering in <br />coordination with the affected landowner/land managing agency will determine the location and extent of <br />the ROW. This route segment would also cross Reclamation’s proposed Wymer Dam Reservoir (MPs <br />8.3-8.6 and 9.1-9.2) and the private lands targeted for acquisition or conservation easement as part of the <br />Yakima River Basin Integrated Water Resource Management Plan (Integrated Plan). These potential <br />acquisition/conservation easement lands are located between MP 6.9 and 9.3. A total of 9.0 acres of short- <br />term impacts and 4.8 acres of long-term impacts on acquisition/conservation easement lands would occur. <br />This route segment also crosses land classified as Farmland of Statewide Importance (0.8 mile) and Prime <br />Farmland (0.1 mile) causing 0.9 mile of long-term disturbance. However, this is non-agricultural land, so <br />impacts would be moderate. <br />Livestock grazing impacts would be low and areas disturbed by construction would be minimal. <br />Following restoration, areas removed from use would include the small areas at the structure footings