Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> <br /> PAGE 4-23 <br />known occupied habitat of Columbia milkvetch in the region. WNHP and BLM Geographic Biotic <br />Observations (GeoBOB) data indicate that this species occurs along an additional 1.4-mile section of <br />Route Segment 2d. These locations include large buffers, so it is difficult to accurately determine whether <br />these occurrences truly intersect the ROW corridor. All potential habitat on federal and state lands was <br />surveyed, so it is unlikely Columbia milkvetch occurs elsewhere in Route Segment 2d. In addition, it was <br />assumed that this occurrence will be spanned and construction activities would avoid this occurrence. <br />Direct and indirect impacts and RDFs that would be implemented to minimize impacts to occurrences <br />Columbia milkvetch are similar to those described above for Route Segment 2b. With the implementation <br />of RDFs described above and the assumption that this occurrence will be spanned and avoided, Project <br />construction, operation, and maintenance activities could impact individuals or habitat (moderate impact), <br />but would not contribute a trend toward federal listing. <br />4.2.4.8 Route Segment 3a <br />General Vegetation <br />Long-term disturbance to approximately 1.2 acres of land would occur through the construction of Route <br />Segment 3a and would be entirely in sagebrush/perennial grasslands (1.2 acre; Table 4.2-4). No short- <br />term disturbance to vegetation is anticipated. Impacts are similar to those described above for Route <br />Segment 1a/NNR-1. Disturbance would be minimized by RDFs described above that are designed to <br />reduce impacts to vegetation resources. RDFs include using existing public roads to access structure sites, <br />minimizing blading and disturbance to plant communities, revegetating following construction, and <br />implementing a Noxious Weed and Invasive Plant Management Plan. Refer to Section 2.3 - Required <br />Design Features Common to Action Alternatives for a complete list and description of RDFs. <br />Impacts for Route Segment 3a are anticipated to be moderate for the total length (0.2 mile). <br />Special Status Species and Priority Habitats <br />No special status plant species or WNHP priority ecosystems are known to occur along Route Segment 3a <br />(Table 4.2-5). Annual sandwort (Minuartia pusilla var. pusilla), beaked spike-rush, Geyer’s milkvetch <br />(Astragalus geyeri), gray cryptantha, and Great Basin gilia (Aliciella leptomeria) occur within one mile of <br />Route Segment 3a. The entirety of this route segment is comprised of non-federal land (3.3 acres) and <br />was not surveyed (Table 3.2-3). As land within the route segment corridors was not surveyed, impacts <br />could occur to special status plant species. Long-term disturbance would occur to 0.1 acre potential <br />suitable habitat for special status plants. RDFs described above for Route Segment 1a/NNR-1 would also <br />be implemented during construction and maintenance of Route Segment 3a to minimize impacts to <br />special status plants. <br />With the implementation of RDFs, impacts to special status plant species and potential suitable habitat are <br />anticipated to include 0.2 mile of moderate impacts. <br />4.2.4.9 Route Segment 3b <br />General Vegetation <br />Long-term disturbance to approximately 28.9 acres of land would occur through the construction of Route <br />Segment 3b (Table 4.2-4). Over three-quarters of the disturbance would occur in areas classified as <br />sagebrush/perennial grassland (25.3 acres). The remaining disturbance would occur in annual (0.4 acre) <br />and perennial (0.7 acre) grasslands, rabbitbrush/annual grassland (0.3 acre), sagebrush/annual grassland <br />(0.4 acre), riparian/wetland (0.4 acre), trees (1.2 acres), and rock/basalt cliff (0.2 acre) cover types. Short- <br />term disturbance would occur to approximately 13.1 acres of vegetation. General vegetation impacts are <br />similar to those described above for Route Segment 1a/NNR-1. Disturbance would be minimized by <br />RDFs described above that are designed to reduce impacts to vegetation resources. RDFs include using