My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> PAGE 4-9 <br />Ground disturbance and vegetation removal can increase the potential for the introduction and spread of <br />noxious weeds and invasive species (Olson 1999; Levine et al. 2003). Non-native plant invasions have the <br />potential to change the composition and diversity of native plants through competition, altering the <br />natural fire regime, and by changing ecosystem processes (e.g., nitrogen cycling). Construction of access <br />roads and the movement of construction equipment and other vehicles along these roads would increase <br />the potential for the spread of noxious weeds and invasive species in the affected areas (Sheley et al. <br />1999; Gelbard and Belnap 2003). Non-native plants, such as cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), create a more <br />continuous fuel bed than native bunchgrasses, resulting in an increase in fire frequency and intensity <br />(Brown 2000; Paysen et al. 2000). See Section 4.12 - Wildland Fire Ecology and Management for more <br />information on potential wildland fire impacts. RDFs would be implemented to minimize the spread of <br />noxious weeds and invasive species from Project activities and include the following: reseeding disturbed <br />areas with certified weed-free, land management agency-approved native or non-native species; washing <br />all equipment before entering the Project area and when leaving areas where noxious weeds are present; <br />closing or rehabilitating new or improved access roads that are not required for ongoing maintenance <br />activities or by the land management agencies; developing and incorporating a Fire Protection and <br />Control Plan into the POD; and complying with all federal, state, and county noxious weed control <br />regulations and guidelines. In addition, a Noxious Weed and Invasive Plant Management Plan would be <br />developed in consultation with land management agencies and local weed control districts and would be <br />incorporated into the final POD. <br />Riparian areas can be particularly vulnerable to disturbance. The removal of vegetation along waterways <br />can cause an increase in water temperature, an increase water velocity, and decrease wildlife habitat. <br />Disturbance of soil in or near riparian areas may lead to erosion of the streambank and increase the <br />deposition of sediment into waterways. In addition, removal of protective vegetation could also expose <br />soil to potential wind and water erosion. This can result in further loss of soil and vegetation, as well as an <br />increase in sediment input to water resources. Impacts to soil and geology are discussed in Section 4.15 <br />Soils and Geology, impacts to water resources are described in Section 4.14 Water Resources, and <br />Section 4.3 Wildlife and Special Status Wildlife Species discusses impacts to wildlife. RDFs to reduce <br />impacts to riparian areas include: avoiding riparian areas and wetlands, where possible, and minimizing <br />disturbance to drainage channels and stream banks. <br />Finally, indirect effects could result from the fragmentation of connected vegetation types. Fragmentation <br />refers to the breaking up of the contiguous areas of vegetation into smaller patches, which results in the <br />creation of habitat edges (i.e., areas where two or more vegetation types meet) along a ROW. Edge areas <br />have different microclimatic conditions and structure, which may lead to different species composition <br />than the interior area (Saunders et al. 1991). Edge effects are typically more dramatic in forest and <br />woodland vegetation communities compared with shrubland and grassland communities. As plant <br />communities become smaller and more fragmented, they become more susceptible to outside influences <br />such as invasive weed species. Habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation has already occurred in the <br />Project area by other transmission lines, roads, highways and interstates, Joint Base Lewis-McChord <br />Yakima Training Center (JBLM YTC) training operations, non-native plant invasions, fire, alteration by <br />livestock grazing, and conversion of sagebrush steppe to residential and agricultural development (JBLM <br />YTC 2002; Rice et al. 2008; Shaw et al. 1999). RDFs would be implemented during construction, <br />operation, and maintenance and are anticipated to be effective at reducing further degradation of habitat. <br />RDFs include: minimizing the blading of native plant communities during construction, consistent with <br />safe construction practices; utilizing existing roads where possible; implementing noxious weed and <br />invasive plant control measures that would be developed as part of a Noxious Weed and Invasive Plant <br />Management Plan that will be incorporated into the final POD; closing or rehabilitating new or improved <br />access roads that are not required for ongoing maintenance activities or by the land management agencies; <br />and reseeding disturbed areas with certified weed-free native or other acceptable species as detailed in the <br />Reclamation, Revegetation, and Monitoring Plan.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.