My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> PAGE 4-6 <br />(WNHP) and/or BLM. The WNHP GIS occurrence polygons include large buffers; therefore, it is <br />uncertain if the occurrences actually intersect with areas of impact from the proposed Project. For the <br />purposes of this analysis, the assumption is made that the entire mapped area is occupied by the species. <br />The WNHP does not disclose special status plant occurrence information for private lands due to privacy <br />laws. Therefore, without surveys on private lands, there is no way to disclose what effects the proposed <br />Project may have on special status plants on private land. <br />For the New Northern Route (NNR) Alternative - Underground Design Option, the analysis assumed that <br />open cut trenching would be used for the entire length of the underground section/route segment. Open <br />cut trenching is the most common method of construction for underground transmission line installation. <br />Also for the NNR Alternative - Underground Design Option, it was assumed that underground splice <br />vaults would not be placed in or near stream and drainage course crossings. Refer to Section 4.14 for <br />more information on impacts to water resources. <br />4.2.1.2 Impact Criteria <br />Sensitivity classifications were assigned to vegetation resources that occur within the Project study area. <br />These sensitivity classifications served as the basis for the assigning of impact levels. Criteria used to <br />assign resource sensitivity included species’ legal status (federally listed and Candidate species; BLM and <br />state sensitive species) and biologically important plant communities (wetlands, riparian areas, aspen, and <br />sagebrush). Table 4.2-1 summarizes the resource sensitivity classification for vegetation resources that <br />occur in the Project area. <br />Table 4.2-1 Vegetation Resource Sensitivity Classifications <br />VEGETATION RESOURCE SENSITIVITY POTENTIAL IMPACT FROM THE PROPOSED PROJECT <br />Riparian, Perennial Streams/Wetland High Reduction in a fragile sensitive habitat. <br />Sagebrush/Perennial Grassland, <br />Bitterbrush/Perennial Grassland High <br />Reduction in quality habitat that supports <br />sensitive obligate species and is slow to <br />recover from disturbance. <br />Special Status Plant Species Occurrences1 High Disturb fragile populations of species and <br />reduction in special status species habitat. <br />Trees High <br />Reduction in quality habitat that supports <br />sensitive obligate species and is slow to <br />recover from disturbance. <br />Rock/Basalt Cliffs Moderate <br />Reduction in quality habitat that supports <br />sensitive obligate species and is limited in <br />distribution. <br />Intermittent Stream or Dry Gully Moderate Reduction in habitat (abundance and quality) <br />that is slow to recover to pre-disturbance state. <br />Sagebrush/Annual Grassland and <br />Rabbitbrush/Annual Grassland Moderate <br />Reduction in habitat (abundance and quality) <br />that is slow to recover to pre-disturbance state <br />or is at-risk of further degradation. <br />Annual Grassland, Perennial Grassland Low Reduction in habitat (abundance and quality). <br />1Based on 2011 and 2013 survey data (Appendix B-3) and WNHP buffered occurrence data (WNHP 2015a). <br />4.2.1.3 Impact Types <br />Impacts to vegetation resources were measured on multiple scales. Impacts can vary in intensity from no <br />change or only slightly discernible change to a full modification of the environment. In addition to the <br />intensity of impacts, duration of impacts was considered. Duration was evaluated in terms of short-term <br />and long-term impacts. The general types of impacts caused by the construction, operation, and <br />maintenance of the proposed Project are presented in Table 4.2-2.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.